Re: [avr-libc-dev] LPM instructions in optimized code causes unintended behavior in execution

[Wouter van Gulik]

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> As Wouter van Gulik wrote:
> 
> > Although true, I rather think this is a GCC bug. The avr instruction
> > documentation says LPM R31, Z+ has undefined results. In the example
> > it was oke to use LPM R31, Z.
> 
> IMHO, the respective code is hand-crafted asm code in avr-libc.

Are you sure? The code is about a jump table, is that in avr-libc?

Wouter