Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] 1.0 branch

[E. Weddington]

> Hi,
> 
> Since things have been quiet for a while, I think it 
might be time to
> cut a 1.0 branch.
> 
> I would like to make a branch in cvs for 1.0 and then 
have cvs head
> become 1.1.<date>cvs.
> 
> I'm partial to the even-odd version number used with the 
linux kernel
> and many other projects. Basically, 
<major>.<minor>.<patch>, where
> minor being odd denotes a development branch and minor 
being even
> denotes a stable branch. Thus, 1.0 will be stable and 
1.1.x is
> development.
> 
> There should be no API changes in a stable branch, only 
bug fixes and
> new functionality back-ported from the dev branch.
> 
> Splitting the version numbers will make it easier to 
distribute
> stable and dev tarballs in parallel.
> 
> If there is no major problems with this proposal, I'll 
cut the branch
> wednesday morning (2003/08/13).
> 

Good with me. I've got my boot.h fix in.

Eric