[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized
|
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
|
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized |
|
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:53:33 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Dmitry K.
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 5:37 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized
>
> On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:29, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> > Should we implement 2 (or 3) div functions then in
> avr-libc? 8, 16, and
> > 32 bit?
>
> Possible, yes. Today the libgcc labrary contains 6 division
> functions (8, 16, 32 bits, signed and unsigned), but Avr-libc
> includes only 2 links (div, ldiv).
Then, yes, it would be good if we could provide interfaces for all
combinations.
- [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Nathan Moore, 2007/12/11
- AW: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Haase Bjoern (PT/EMM1), 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Albert Andras, 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Gre7g Luterman, 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Paulo Marques, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Paulo Marques, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Gre7g Luterman, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Paulo Marques, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, David Brown, 2007/12/12