[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized
|
From: |
Dmitry K. |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:37:03 +1000 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Wednesday 12 December 2007 09:29, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> Should we implement 2 (or 3) div functions then in avr-libc? 8, 16, and
> 32 bit?
Possible, yes. Today the libgcc labrary contains 6 division
functions (8, 16, 32 bits, signed and unsigned), but Avr-libc
includes only 2 links (div, ldiv).
Dmitry.
- [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Nathan Moore, 2007/12/11
- AW: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Haase Bjoern (PT/EMM1), 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Albert Andras, 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Gre7g Luterman, 2007/12/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Paulo Marques, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Paulo Marques, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Gre7g Luterman, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, Paulo Marques, 2007/12/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] dev and mod may not be optimized, David Brown, 2007/12/12