Re: [avr-gcc-list] maga256 patch for GCC 4.2

[Harald Kipp]

Anatoly,

I understood your arguments against taking main() as a normal function. 
But I do not understand...

1. ...why this implies to modify the stack pointer on entry. This spoils 
any the stack pointer modification in the .init segment.
2. ...your statement about "In oficial GCC 4.x main() do not converted 
to a normal function." I'm sure that in official GCC main() is always a 
subroutine and always returns an int.

Harald

Anatoly Sokolov schrieb:
> PS: "main as normal function" part removed from 'mega256' patch. You can find 
> patch in savannah bug record #19050: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?19050. 
> (main-as-normal.diff )
>
>