Re: [avr-gcc-list] FW: c/9100: illegal binary constant causes gcc to seg fault

[E. Weddington]

On 2 Jan 2003 at 11:16, Sander Pool wrote:

> 
> I guess I was thrown off by this page:
> 
> http://padmin1.ncsa.uiuc.edu/auxdocs/intelcompiler/ref/cnst_c.htm
> 
> which talks about an intel compiler, not the standard. I don't know
> where I got the idea from that 0b was the proper binary constant form
> for c. Somehow I found a web page that agreed with me. See, the web is
> a dangerous place :-)
> 
>     Sander
> 
Hey, I got confused too. I thought you were right. I think that where 
you got the idea for using 0b from is from assembly programming. On 
the web I noticed that a lot of assemblers allow that prefix for 
specifying binary numbers. Yeah, sometimes it all just runs 
together....

Eric
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org