avr-chat
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-chat] Re: Variable Pinouts


From: Joerg Wunsch
Subject: Re: [avr-chat] Re: Variable Pinouts
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:07:47 +0200 (MET DST)

"Steve Franks" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Since templates are handled by the
> preprocessor, I don't think it adds overhead either.

Well, they are not handled by the preprocessor (that's the part of the
compiler that handles #include and such), but I agree that they should
not add overhead provided they are properly done.  They are somewhat
like C++'s replacement for traditional macros.

It's just that many embedded programmers (me included) are probably
much more familiar with C than C++.

The era when C++ could be implemented by a simple preprocessing into C
code has IMHO long since passed.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]