[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:14:37 +0100 |
Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> One ludicrously minor nit: we should put references to bug reports,
> names of people to thanks, or old commits that introduced a regression
> *before* the list of touched files, and always separated by a leading
> and a trailing blank line; like this:
Adjusted and pushed.
I'll try to remember.
In other projects, I don't have a hard and fast policy for that,
but more often put it after the ChangeLog entries with no separating
blank line. My thinking is that where the flaw was introduced is a
relatively minor detail, which doesn't deserve its own paragraph.
That is especially so here, since it was the preceding commit.
- [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed, Jim Meyering, 2012/02/25
- Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/25
- Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed, Jim Meyering, 2012/02/25
- Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/25
- Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/25
- [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages (was: Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/25
- [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages (was: Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid spurious failure when gcj is not installed), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/25
- Re: [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages, Jim Meyering, 2012/02/26
- Re: [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/26
- Re: [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/26
- Re: [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages, Jim Meyering, 2012/02/26
- Re: [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages, Eric Blake, 2012/02/27
- Re: [PATCH] hacking: document format for git commit messages, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/02/27