[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch pings

From: Alexandre Duret-Lutz
Subject: Re: patch pings
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:42:05 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

>>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:


 RW> No problem.  Please indicate though which branches some patch should be
 RW> applied to (I write for HEAD only).  

That's fine, let's forget the branch, I don't plan to make an
1.9.7 unless something very serious happen.  I'd rather focus on
releasing 1.10 as soon as Autoconf is out.

 RW> You regenerate files with CVS Autoconf and with the
 RW> Automake version that is being checked in, right?

Yeah, just don't mention these files in ChangeLog.  I usually
don't a force full regeneration anytime I change a bit, I just
let it happen by make (unless that bit actually has an effect to
all Automake's Makefiles, of course -- one reason these files
are checked in is to force ourself looking how the real bits
changes), but any way is not really a problem.
Alexandre Duret-Lutz

Shared books are happy books.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]