[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch pings
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: patch pings |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Mar 2006 07:19:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi Alexandre,
* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:42:05AM CET:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
>
> RW> You regenerate files with CVS Autoconf and with the
> RW> Automake version that is being checked in, right?
>
> Yeah, just don't mention these files in ChangeLog. I usually
> don't a force full regeneration anytime I change a bit, I just
> let it happen by make (unless that bit actually has an effect to
> all Automake's Makefiles, of course -- one reason these files
> are checked in is to force ourself looking how the real bits
> changes), but any way is not really a problem.
Ok. I frequently install the latest of CVS Autoconf, or test
proposed changes (which I hope to be able to keep from propagating
into Automake's generated files). In any case I updated the files
to current CVS Autoconf now.
Cheers,
Ralf