[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: patch pings

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: patch pings
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 07:19:45 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Hi Alexandre,

* Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote on Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 07:42:05AM CET:
> >>> "RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
>  RW> You regenerate files with CVS Autoconf and with the
>  RW> Automake version that is being checked in, right?
> Yeah, just don't mention these files in ChangeLog.  I usually
> don't a force full regeneration anytime I change a bit, I just
> let it happen by make (unless that bit actually has an effect to
> all Automake's Makefiles, of course -- one reason these files
> are checked in is to force ourself looking how the real bits
> changes), but any way is not really a problem.

Ok.  I frequently install the latest of CVS Autoconf, or test
proposed changes (which I hope to be able to keep from propagating
into Automake's generated files).  In any case I updated the files
to current CVS Autoconf now.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]