Re: Patch: RFA: new option

[Alexandre Duret-Lutz]

>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:

 >>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
 Tom> Ok, thanks.  I'll send an updated patch a bit later.

 Tom> What do you think of this?

Looks good.

 Tom> I'd like to get this in 1.7.7 so that we can start using it in gcc.

So that will be a "bug fix++" release.  If this can push
newer Automakes in the gcc tree I presume it's a Good Thing.

I guess that the fact we start adding new features onto the
branch (I'm also thinking of the multilib fixes as a new
feature) is an indication that 1.8 is taking too long.

 Tom> We're also looking forward to the post-1.7.6 multilib bug fixes.

I'm glad to hear that.  After Alexandre Oliva's comments [1]
I've been wondering whether fixing these rules was better than
removing them entirely.

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg02933.html
-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz