Re: Removing the non trace based code

[Alexandre Duret-Lutz]

>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:

 Akim> I am willing to remove the non trace based code from Automake.  Is
 Akim> there any body would fear this?

 Akim> There is one single issue: people who still use LIBOBJ assignments
 Akim> instead of AC_LIBOBJ will have bad surprises.  But this is a task for
 Akim> Autoconf, not for Automake.

Do you mean you want to warn about user LIBOBJS assignments in
Autoconf (say by using some special comment after the assignment
and grepping the configure output for assignments that don't have
it) and require this new version of Autoconf from Automake?
Or do you simply want to put a big warning in the NEWS?
Something else?  (BTW does autoupdate handles this?)

 Akim> Comments?  I'm using it, and it's working *fine*.
 Akim> Really.  Many many simplifications.

That will be great!
-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz