[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_HEADER_STDBOOL: checking for _Bool separately for C and C++
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: AC_HEADER_STDBOOL: checking for _Bool separately for C and C++ |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:15:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 08/28/2012 12:34 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
> A serious question: is there any C++ compiler out there which defines
> _Bool by default (without including stdbool.h)
I don't know of any offhand (remember, I don't use C++...)
but it seems quite likely that there would be, no? It would
be a valid extension to C++, and it would let a C++ compile
more C code without awkward fiddling.