[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Noooooooooo!
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: Noooooooooo! |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Sep 2008 21:09:47 +0000 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> This ignores the fact that some users get this warning not because they
> are using unprefixed tools, but rather because they are using compiler
> wrappers like mpicc, mpxlc etc. And they may not even really do cross
> compiling, it may just be that their system consists of two units, a
> compile one and a (massively parallel) compute one. IMVHO it is quite
> unusual to ask them to add symlinks to some weird names.
I've been in those situations too. And I added the symlinks using the
expected names anyway. But that was my choice.
> I think we should keep a warning (so that unwary users get aware that
> they *may* be using the wrong tools), but not the current one. Proposed
> replacement:
>
> configure: WARNING: using cross tools not prefixed with host triplet
That proposed new warning looks fine to me.
H
- RE: Noooooooooo!, Duft Markus, 2008/09/01
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Daniel E. Macks, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Brian Dessent, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Allan Clark, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/02
- Autoconf will (not?) detect cross-tools unprefixed (was: Noooooooooo!), Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!,
Harlan Stenn <=
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Bob Rossi, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Steffen DETTMER, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Harlan Stenn, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Steffen DETTMER, 2008/09/02
- Re: Noooooooooo!, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/09/02