[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x86_64 and x86 userland
From: |
Jacob Meuser |
Subject: |
Re: x86_64 and x86 userland |
Date: |
Mon, 2 May 2005 22:38:53 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2i |
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> I have a question regarding systems with more than one ABI, specifically
> x86_64. If you consider for example the Debian distribution which has a
> x86_64 kernel, but a completely x86 userland, config.guess still gives
> you x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu as output. (I have been told this, but not
> tried it myself).
>
> Now, if you configure a package and forget to add
> --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> or maybe use the setarch tool to set personality (I do not even know how
> portable/available this is -- it exists in RedHat Fedora), it may break,
> e.g. because of the __x86_64__ preprocessor define.
>
> Would it not make more sense to have config.guess return i686 instead of
> x86_64? Is it just too late to make that change now? How would it even
> be possible to detect a completely 32bit userland?
>
> Should I rather ask this on the config-patches list or elsewhere?
could a config.site that comes with such distributions be used to
handle this?
--
<address@hidden>
- x86_64 and x86 userland, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/05/02
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland, Paul Eggert, 2005/05/02
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland, Noah Misch, 2005/05/02
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland,
Jacob Meuser <=
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland, Harald Dunkel, 2005/05/03
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/05/03
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/05/03
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland, Bob Proulx, 2005/05/03
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland, Florian Weimer, 2005/05/05
- Re: x86_64 and x86 userland, Richard B. Kreckel, 2005/05/18