autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++


From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: Contents of <confdefs.h> for C++
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 09:57:51 -0700 (PDT)

> Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 10:40:17 -0500
> From: "Walter E. Brown" <address@hidden>
> 
> Thanks, Paul, for the courteous and quick response.
> 
> Suppose my program defines entities whose names clash with names
> declared in <stdlib.h>.

That's certainly reasonable, but we're not talking about your actual
program here.  We're talking about what the little test program -- the
one that "configure" compiles.  Surely this little test program can be
written so that it will still work as desired even if <stdlib.h> is
included.

> However, there may be compelling reasons for autoconf's current
> behavior

If you find them out, please let me know.  Like I said, I don't use
C++, so I'm not the right guy to ask.  It would be helpful if this
stuff were written down as comments in the source.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]