Re: 2.49e problems with gcc

[Thomas Dickey]

On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 03:00:38PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
> 
>       (partly stolen from AC_CHECK_DECLS) but this requires cvs autoconf, I
>       believe.
> 
> Yes, it does.  And if you require 2.50, then just use AC_CHECK_DECLS :)
> 
>       Is there a good way to say this in 2.13-speak, so I can
>       suggest a patch to the gcc maintainers?
>       
> Sorry, but I'm lost again.  What is the full picture?  If the real and
> only problem is that of the #undef templates, then the easiest
> transition between the two models is most probably acconfig.h.
> 
> All this (AC_FOREACH, AH_ etc.) was precisely set up so that people
> could build their templates like this.  In 2.13 it is just
> impossible.  You are trying to have the two models cooperate, but they

not impossible, just different (in 2.13 the iteration is generally done in the
shell script because the autoconf 2.13 distribution has no macros defined
for this purpose).

> are very different, and we moved from the first one because of this.

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://dickey.his.com
ftp://dickey.his.com