[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoconf option fun
|
From: |
Peter Eisentraut |
|
Subject: |
Re: autoconf option fun |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Nov 2000 23:03:23 +0100 (CET) |
Pavel Roskin writes:
> I realize that we are in the beta stage, but releasing Autoconf violating
> GNU standards is not good.
Exactly where do the GNU standards say anything about long option
abbreviation?
--
Peter Eisentraut address@hidden http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: autoconf option fun, (continued)
- Re: autoconf option fun, Bruce Korb, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun,
Peter Eisentraut <=
- Re: autoconf option fun, Pavel Roskin, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun, Bruce Korb, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/11/10
- Re: autoconf option fun, Bruce Korb, 2000/11/09
- Re: autoconf option fun, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10