[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] minor issue of fontification if \begin{verbatim}foo

From: jfbu
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] minor issue of fontification if \begin{verbatim}foo
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 19:46:59 +0200

Le 18 sept. 2016 à 19:33, Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> a écrit :

> jfbu <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Jean-Francois,
>>> Good catch.  I've pushed a fix just now.  Let me know if it works (or
>>> exhibits problems in other situations).
>> Sorry for the delay. I confirm the commit fixes it, but my test file
>> also had
>> \begin{verbatim}XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\end{verbatim}
>> and this confuses the fontifying.
> Argh, you are a hard opponent.  But I think my latest commit fixes this,
> too, namely I don't require that the \end{env} is on its own line with
> at most whitespace in front of it anymore.  I hope it doesn't have any
> negative consequences, though.  Well, and if it has, I guess _you_ will
> tell me. :-)

Good work ! not seen negative consequences so far ...

>> You said to exhibit problems ! ;-) 
> Keep it going, I'm at the top of the font-latex game! ;-)

I have been thinking about putting now the \end{verbatim}
_before_ the \begin{verbatim} but you are a lucky guy as
LaTeX does not like that ;-)

By the way, could there be a way to have a fontifying like
in verbatim but at the same time not have restriction on
what one can do with fill-paragraph etc.., i.e. it could
reflow like standard LaTeX code is allowed too ?

Indeed I have a context where I have an environment
where I write LaTeX code which gets executed and also
verbatim-printed. So far I turned off verbatim fontification
for this environment, but it would be nice to have it
nevertheless distinguished form the rest of the code

(don't know if this is clear)



> Bye,
> Tassilo

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]