[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep
From: |
Joost Kremers |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep |
Date: |
Sat, 31 May 2008 18:34:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) |
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 05:57:59PM +0200, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> > what happens if the optional argument isn't there, and the user hasn't
> > supplied an optional argument? would you use some default string or leave
> > it empty?
>
> Unless I am misunderstanding you, that's what the <alt_string> is for.
sorry, my question was confusing. what i meant to say was: what happens
if the optional argument isn't there, and the user hasn't supplied an
*alternative string*?
> That means, if the optional argument is not found, the [...] placeholder
> would be replaced by the alternative string as described above.
>
> I'm not sure if this is flexible enough. The scheme does not cater for
> the situation where one wants to use a completely different string if
> the optional argument is not found. For example for "\item[foo]" you
> might wanna display "foo:" but for "\item" just "*".
mmm... perhaps i'm not understanding you correctly... isn't this what you
get when you supply "*" as the alternative string? i.e. if you specify
"[1:*]" as the replacement string?
--
Joost Kremers, PhD
University of Frankfurt
Institute for Cognitive Linguistics
Grüneburgplatz 1
60629 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Rasmus Pank Roulund, 2008/05/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Joost Kremers, 2008/05/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Ralf Angeli, 2008/05/10
- [AUCTeX] Re: Fold citep, Rasmus Pank Roulund, 2008/05/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Joost Kremers, 2008/05/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Ralf Angeli, 2008/05/30
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Joost Kremers, 2008/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Ralf Angeli, 2008/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep,
Joost Kremers <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Ralf Angeli, 2008/05/31