[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep
From: |
Ralf Angeli |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep |
Date: |
Sat, 31 May 2008 18:58:45 +0200 |
* Joost Kremers (2008-05-31) writes:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 05:57:59PM +0200, Ralf Angeli wrote:
>> > what happens if the optional argument isn't there, and the user hasn't
>> > supplied an optional argument? would you use some default string or leave
>> > it empty?
>>
>> Unless I am misunderstanding you, that's what the <alt_string> is for.
>
> sorry, my question was confusing. what i meant to say was: what happens
> if the optional argument isn't there, and the user hasn't supplied an
> *alternative string*?
Then the placeholder would be replaced by an empty string, I guess.
>> I'm not sure if this is flexible enough. The scheme does not cater for
>> the situation where one wants to use a completely different string if
>> the optional argument is not found. For example for "\item[foo]" you
>> might wanna display "foo:" but for "\item" just "*".
>
> mmm... perhaps i'm not understanding you correctly... isn't this what you
> get when you supply "*" as the alternative string? i.e. if you specify
> "[1:*]" as the replacement string?
This would result in "*" for "\item", but "foo" for "\item[foo]". In
order to get "foo:" for "\item[foo]" one would need to supply "[1:*]:"
but this would result in "*:" for "\item".
--
Ralf
- [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Rasmus Pank Roulund, 2008/05/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Joost Kremers, 2008/05/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Ralf Angeli, 2008/05/10
- [AUCTeX] Re: Fold citep, Rasmus Pank Roulund, 2008/05/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Joost Kremers, 2008/05/18
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Ralf Angeli, 2008/05/30
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Joost Kremers, 2008/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Ralf Angeli, 2008/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep, Joost Kremers, 2008/05/31
- Re: [AUCTeX] Fold citep,
Ralf Angeli <=