axiom-developer archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ aldor: 2190 ]

Total 2190 documents matching your query.

341. [Axiom-developer] Aldor compilation for Axiom (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 01:30:42 +0100
Hello, could someone tell me what ")compile blah.as" is actually doing in Axiom? It is certainly more than saying aldor -O -Fasy -Fao -Flsp -laxiom -Mno-AXL_W_WillObsolete -DAxiom -Y $AXIOM/algebra b
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-11/msg00240.html (5,456 bytes)

342. [Axiom-developer] Aldor extend for extending Axiom code (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 21 Oct 2006 21:35:07 +0200
Dear Peter, since I managed to have axiom and aldor work together again (I HATE MAKE: 2 hours), I'm currently trying to get our aldor-combinat package running in Axiom, by coding a compatibility laye
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-10/msg00404.html (6,127 bytes)

343. Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor and Axiom (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:07:25 +0200
We should focus on either SPAD (make it better) or Aldor (hopeless). Gaby, you should have replaced 'better' by 'Aldor' (language). ;-) Ralf
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-09/msg00425.html (5,325 bytes)

344. Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor and Axiom (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 14 Sep 2006 14:58:48 +0200
I tend to agree with Martin. We should focus on either SPAD (make it better) or Aldor (hopeless). -- Gaby
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-09/msg00424.html (5,448 bytes)

345. Re: [Axiom-developer] Aldor and Axiom (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 14 Sep 2006 14:40:00 +0200
Dear all, I believe that we should *not* embark on designing yet another language. I played enough with Aldor meanwhile to really appreciate the language - with it's deficiencies. Those of you inclin
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-09/msg00423.html (5,598 bytes)

346. [Axiom-developer] RE: aldor for axiom link in the page (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:24:49 -0400
Greg, Yes, sorry. The reason your change was rejected is because of the large number of bare http://... links on that page. The number of such links is restricted becase of spam. But you can still us
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00637.html (4,874 bytes)

347. [Axiom-developer] aldor for axiom link in the page (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 02:57:44 +0200
Hello Bill, I wanted to add "If you want to use the aldor compiler see [Aldor For Axiom]." at the end of the 'Building Axiom on Linux' paragraph (page : http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/BuildAxiom) wi
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00634.html (4,406 bytes)

348. Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom, SPAD, and Aldor (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 23 Aug 2006 05:38:53 +0200
[...] I have been using, for a week now, "Bemol" as a code-name for a language that is SPAD-like but with more defined type system and semantics. It is still a work-in-program a colleague and I are c
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00536.html (4,632 bytes)

349. RE: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiomlately? (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 17:13:04 -0400
Cliff, the problem is not you - it's those dork spam artists who insist on abusing our web site... :( The reason your edit to AldorForAxiom was being rejected is because the page contained at least o
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00256.html (10,289 bytes)

350. Re: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiom lately? (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 13:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Bill, sorry for being such a dork - I'm looking at AldorForAxiom, and I don't quite see why it's not letting me save the change. It looks like most of the links are using the "link text":http... meth
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00255.html (9,905 bytes)

351. Re: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiom lately? (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:26:23 -0700 (PDT)
Hmm - I just tried to update AldorForAxiom with this info, and it won't let me. My preferences are set up - guess I need to go re-read the anti-spam changes, I must be missing something. Thanks Vanux
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00254.html (8,446 bytes)

352. Re: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiom lately? (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:45:18 -0700
mkdir -p /home/user/mathtoplevel/axiomtoplevel/axiom/obj/linux/aldor/build touch -t 199901010000 /home/user/mathtoplevel/axiomtoplevel/axiom/obj/linux/aldor/build/.dir MERGE: libaxiom_lang.lst (1) (c
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00252.html (10,591 bytes)

353. Re: [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiom lately? (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:38:44 +0200
Le dimanche 13 août 2006 à 08:22 -0700, C Y a écrit : [...] [...] Yes I faced the same problem, I commented out (dirty hack) the "@false", ligne 68 of src/aldor/libaxiom.mk : $(MID)/as/attrib.as::
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00251.html (7,389 bytes)

354. [Axiom-developer] Has anybody attempted to build Aldor+Axiom lately? (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 08:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
I tried the binary and found it didn't work on Gentoo, so it was back to building from source. I got most of the way there with a gold branch cvs checkout (I think it's fairly recent) and started up
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00248.html (7,836 bytes)

355. [Axiom-developer] Axiom patch-49 (+ Aldor 1.0.3) compiles on FreeBSD :-)) (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:24:41 +0200
Hi, I am working with Axiom/Aldor on FreeBSD systems (FreeBSD 6.1 and 5.4, gcl-2.6.6 and gcl-2.6.7). After Axiom compiles fine (with some with some minor patches I will provide after cleaning up them
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-08/msg00091.html (5,127 bytes)

356. non-constant constants was: Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Re: exports and constants (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 07:43:05 +0200
Hi Bill, I turned exports into a function, as you'd probably want to call it more than once. I don't understand the relevance of whether exports is a function or not. As a generator we can use it as
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-07/msg00206.html (9,599 bytes)

357. [Axiom-developer] Re: Aldor translations (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 03:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
No, if it is indeed as simple as that. I didn't realize the algebra code in Axiom could be made to work without the interp behind it - I think that was the incorrect assumption I was making. I'm not
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-07/msg00202.html (7,849 bytes)

358. Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] exports and constants (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:16:07 +0200
But perhaps "has" is not so weak. What other applications of reflection are there other then conditional ones? Yes "has" is quite weak. One has to give the type you are trying to test on the right ha
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-07/msg00106.html (8,863 bytes)

359. [Axiom-developer] RE: [Aldor-l] exports and constants (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:59:01 -0400
Yes. In my opinion this is a serious bug in the current implementation. This bug will affect the conversion of significant parts of the Axiom library from SPAD to Aldor. See for example DirectProduct
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-07/msg00087.html (6,407 bytes)

360. [Axiom-developer] Re: [Aldor-l] exports and constants (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:25:01 -0400
Ask Stephen Watt (address@hidden)
/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-07/msg00083.html (7,803 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu