[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff
From: |
Gian Filippo Pinzari |
Subject: |
Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:42:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Wednesday 01 October 2003 10:20, Per Cederberg wrote:
> Reflection: Seems like state-of-the-art X-technology is
> popping up everywhere now... Everybody waited for this
> moment?
I'm experiencing the same feeling :-). Inertia in the X-Window
world is big, given the complexity and the respectable 'history'
accompaining it. Personally I started to work on this 4 years
ago and multiple times I had to fight against people trying to
explaining me that X was already good enough and nothing
new could be invented.
/Gian Filippo Pinzari.
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Shawn, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Per Cederberg, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Rich Wareham, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Steve Nickolas, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Shawn, 2003/10/01
- RE: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, David Ross, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Gian Filippo Pinzari, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Gian Filippo Pinzari, 2003/10/02
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff,
Gian Filippo Pinzari <=
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, weigelt, 2003/10/01