[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff
From: |
Per Cederberg |
Subject: |
Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Oct 2003 10:20:16 +0200 |
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 04:33, Gian Filippo Pinzari wrote:
> <snip>
> Everybody agrees that toolkits and X applications should be better optimized
> for low-bandwidth links. Clients would run faster even on local X connections
> and people would finally stop blaming X :-). I dedicated to blaming X
> developers
> a big part of the README that accompained release MS1 of mlview-dxpc,
> in March 2001 :-). Nevertheless I'm not sure we said 'X application could
> perform just as well' by only removing round-trips. Probably even after
> having
> removed all the un-needed round trips, X would still need proxying and good
> compression :-).
Thanks for the detailed explanations! I guess I should
really try installing NX one of these days... (Not that
I really need it, but it does sound interesting.)
Reflection: Seems like state-of-the-art X-technology is
popping up everywhere now... Everybody waited for this
moment?
Cheers,
/Per
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Shawn, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff,
Per Cederberg <=
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Rich Wareham, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Steve Nickolas, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Shawn, 2003/10/01
- RE: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, David Ross, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Gian Filippo Pinzari, 2003/10/01
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Gian Filippo Pinzari, 2003/10/02
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, Gian Filippo Pinzari, 2003/10/02
- Re: [xougen] GPL-ed X compression scheme -- my gaff, weigelt, 2003/10/01