[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
|
From: |
Javier Fdez. Retenaga |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point.... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 4 Mar 2019 05:49:49 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Javier Fdez. Retenaga <jfrtnaga> 19/03/04 05:49:49
Modified files:
philosophy/po : open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
Log message:
Update.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.103&r2=1.104
Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.103
retrieving revision 1.104
diff -u -b -r1.103 -r1.104
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.103
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 4 Mar 2019 10:49:49 -0000 1.104
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.8.11\n"
@@ -158,36 +157,6 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
-# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
-# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
-# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
-# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
-# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
-# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
-# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
-# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
-# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
-# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
-# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
-# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
-# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\";>
-# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
-# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
-# | many that don't.+}
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
-#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
-#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
-#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
-#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
-#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
-#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
-#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
-#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
-#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
-#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -209,45 +178,18 @@
"Algunos de los defensores del «código abierto» lo consideraron una
«campaña "
"de marketing para el software libre», con el objetivo de atraer a los "
"ejecutivos de las empresas enfatizando los beneficios prácticos sin "
-"mencionar conceptos de lo que es correcto e incorrecto —y que quizá "
-"los empresarios no deseaban oÃr—. Otros defensores rechazaban "
-"rotundamente los valores éticos y sociales del software libre. Cualesquiera "
-"que hayan sido sus puntos de vista, cuando hacÃan campaña por el «código "
-"abierto» no mencionaban ni abogaban por esos valores. La expresión
«código "
-"abierto» fue rápidamente asociada con ideas y argumentaciones basadas "
-"únicamente en valores de orden práctico, tales como desarrollar o usar "
-"software potente y confiable. La mayorÃa de los partidarios del «código "
-"abierto» llegaron al movimiento después de entonces y hacen la misma "
-"asociación de conceptos."
+"mencionar conceptos de lo que es correcto e incorrecto, que quizá los "
+"empresarios no deseaban oÃr. Otros defensores rechazaban rotundamente los "
+"valores éticos y sociales del software libre. Cualesquiera que hayan sido "
+"sus puntos de vista, cuando hacÃan campaña por el «código abierto» no "
+"mencionaban ni abogaban por esos valores. La expresión «código abierto»
fue "
+"rápidamente asociada con ideas y argumentaciones basadas únicamente en "
+"valores de orden práctico, tales como desarrollar o usar software potente y "
+"confiable. La mayorÃa de los partidarios del «código abierto» llegaron al
"
+"movimiento después de entonces y hacen la misma asociación de conceptos."
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
-# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
-# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
-# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
-# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
-# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
-# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
-# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
-# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
-# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
-# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\";>
-# | typical example</a>.-]
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
-#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
-#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
-#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
-#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
-#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
-#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
-#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
-#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
-#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.";
-#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
-#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
msgid ""
"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
@@ -257,19 +199,13 @@
"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
-"Ambas expresiones describen casi la misma categorÃa de software, pero "
-"representan puntos de vista basados en valores fundamentalmente diferentes. "
-"El código abierto es una metodologÃa de programación, el software libre es
"
-"un movimiento social. Para el movimiento del software libre, el software "
-"libre es un imperativo ético, respeto esencial por la libertad de los "
-"usuarios. En cambio la filosofÃa del código abierto plantea las cuestiones "
-"en términos de cómo «mejorar» el software, en sentido meramente
práctico. "
-"Sostiene que el software privativo no es una solución óptima para los "
-"problemas prácticos que hay que resolver. En la mayorÃa de los casos,
cuando "
-"se discute sobre «código abierto» no se toma en consideración el bien y
el "
-"mal sino únicamente la popularidad y el éxito; he aquà un <a
href=\"http://";
-"www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
-"Trends-78937.html\">ejemplo tÃpico</a>."
+"Ambos describen casi la misma categorÃa de software, pero representan puntos
"
+"de vista basados en valores fundamentalmente diferentes. Para el movimiento "
+"del software libre, el software libre es un imperativo ético, respeto "
+"esencial por la libertad de los usuarios. En cambio, la filosofÃa del
código "
+"abierto plantea las cuestiones en términos de cómo «mejorar» el software,
en "
+"sentido meramente práctico. Sostiene que el software privativo no es una "
+"solución óptima para los problemas prácticos que hay que resolver."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""