[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po software/po/recen...
|
From: |
Ineiev |
|
Subject: |
www licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po software/po/recen... |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Dec 2018 12:18:48 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Ineiev <ineiev> 18/12/25 12:18:48
Modified files:
licenses/po : gpl-faq.ru.po
software/po : recent-releases-include.ru.po
Log message:
Update.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.154&r2=1.155
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2272&r2=1.2273
Patches:
Index: licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.154
retrieving revision 1.155
diff -u -b -r1.154 -r1.155
--- licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po 25 Dec 2018 15:29:37 -0000 1.154
+++ licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po 25 Dec 2018 17:18:45 -0000 1.155
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: gpl-faq.html\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-12-25 15:26+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2018-09-14 17:17+0000\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2018-12-25 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
"Language: ru\n"
@@ -121,7 +121,6 @@
# | <a href=\"#AssignCopyright\">Why does the FSF require that contributors to
# | FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright
# | on a GPL[-'-]ed program, should I do this, too? If so, how?</a>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"#AssignCopyright\">Why does the FSF require that contributors "
#| "to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold "
@@ -190,7 +189,6 @@
# | <a href=\"#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid\">What does “written offer
# | valid for any third party” mean in GPLv2? Does that mean everyone in
# | the world can get the source to any GPL[-'-]ed program no matter what?</a>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid\">What does “written offer "
#| "valid for any third party” mean in GPLv2? Does that mean everyone "
@@ -244,7 +242,6 @@
# | <a href=\"#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic\">If I distribute
# | GPL[-'-]{+e+}d software for a fee, am I required to also make it available
# | to the public without a charge?</a>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic\">If I distribute GPL'd "
#| "software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to the public "
@@ -853,7 +850,6 @@
# | <a href=\"#CompanyGPLCostsMoney\">I just found out that a company has a
# | copy of a GPL[-'-]ed program, and it costs money to get it. Aren't they
# | violating the GPL by not making it available on the Internet?</a>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"#CompanyGPLCostsMoney\">I just found out that a company has a "
#| "copy of a GPL'ed program, and it costs money to get it. Aren't they "
@@ -871,7 +867,6 @@
# | <a href=\"#UnreleasedMods\">A company is running a modified version of a
# | GPL[-'-]ed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they must release
# | their modified sources?</a>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"#UnreleasedMods\">A company is running a modified version of a "
#| "GPL'ed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they must release their "
@@ -1195,7 +1190,6 @@
# | <a href=\"#LinkingWithGPL\">You have a GPL[-'-]ed program that I'd like to
# | link with my code to build a proprietary program. Does the fact that I
# | link with your program mean I have to GPL my program?</a>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"#LinkingWithGPL\">You have a GPL'ed program that I'd like to "
#| "link with my code to build a proprietary program. Does the fact that I "
@@ -1373,7 +1367,6 @@
# | <a href=\"#OOPLang\">In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I use
# | a class that is GPL[-'-]ed without modifying, and subclass it, in what way
# | does the GPL affect the larger program?</a>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"#OOPLang\">In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I "
#| "use a class that is GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it, in what "
@@ -1456,7 +1449,6 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
# | <a href=\"#HeardOtherLicense\">I heard that someone got a copy of a
# | GPL[-'-]ed program under another license. Is this possible?</a>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"#HeardOtherLicense\">I heard that someone got a copy of a "
#| "GPL'ed program under another license. Is this possible?</a>"
@@ -1810,7 +1802,6 @@
# | GPLv2? Does that mean everyone in the world can get the source to any
# | GPL[-'-]ed program no matter what? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
# | href=\"#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid\" >#WhatDoesWrittenOfferValid</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "What does “written offer valid for any third party” mean in "
#| "GPLv2? Does that mean everyone in the world can get the source to any "
@@ -2079,7 +2070,6 @@
# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\"> (<a
# | href=\"#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic\"
# | >#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "If I distribute GPL'd software for a fee, am I required to also make it "
#| "available to the public without a charge? <span class=\"anchor-reference-"
@@ -2262,7 +2252,6 @@
# | not allow you to place such a <a href=\"#GPLOutput\">requirement on the
# | output of software</a>, regardless of whether it is licensed under the
# | terms of the GPL or some other license.
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "No, this is not permitted under the terms of the GPL. While we recognize "
#| "that proper citation is an important part of academic publications, "
@@ -3054,7 +3043,6 @@
# | I heard that someone got a copy of a GPL[-'-]ed program under another
# | license. Is this possible? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
# | href=\"#HeardOtherLicense\" >#HeardOtherLicense</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "I heard that someone got a copy of a GPL'ed program under another "
#| "license. Is this possible? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href="
@@ -3372,7 +3360,6 @@
# | also provide your application in an object (not necessarily source)
# | format, so that a user has the opportunity to modify the library and
# | relink the application.
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "(1) If you statically link against an LGPL'd library, you must also "
#| "provide your application in an object (not necessarily source) format, "
@@ -3395,7 +3382,6 @@
# | LGPL[-'-]{+e+}d library along with your application, whether linked with
# | statically or dynamically, you must also convey the library's sources, in
# | one of the ways for which the LGPL provides.
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "(2) If you dynamically link against an LGPL'd library <em>already present "
#| "on the user's computer</em>, you need not convey the library's source. On "
@@ -3673,7 +3659,6 @@
# | Java classes in your program, you must release the program in a
# | GPL-compatible way, regardless of the license used in the Perl or Java
# | interpreter that the combined Perl or Java program will run on.
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "A consequence is that if you choose to use GPL'd Perl modules or Java "
#| "classes in your program, you must release the program in a GPL-compatible "
@@ -3959,7 +3944,6 @@
# | a proprietary program. Does the fact that I link with your program mean I
# | have to GPL my program? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
# | href=\"#LinkingWithGPL\" >#LinkingWithGPL</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "You have a GPL'ed program that I'd like to link with my code to build a "
#| "proprietary program. Does the fact that I link with your program mean I "
@@ -4313,7 +4297,6 @@
# | assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL[-'-]ed program,
# | should I do this, too? If so, how? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
# | href=\"#AssignCopyright\" >#AssignCopyright</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Why does the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs "
#| "assign copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, "
@@ -5162,7 +5145,6 @@
# | site. Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources? <span
# | class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a href=\"#UnreleasedMods\"
# | >#UnreleasedMods</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "A company is running a modified version of a GPL'ed program on a web "
#| "site. Does the GPL say they must release their modified sources? <span "
@@ -5201,7 +5183,6 @@
# | languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
# | programs being distributed must be released to the user under the terms of
# | the GPL.
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to "
#| "separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed to the user when they visit "
@@ -6117,7 +6098,6 @@
# | GPL[-'-]ed without modifying, and subclass it, in what way does the GPL
# | affect the larger program? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
# | href=\"#OOPLang\" >#OOPLang</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In an object-oriented language such as Java, if I use a class that is "
#| "GPL'ed without modifying, and subclass it, in what way does the GPL "
@@ -6138,7 +6118,6 @@
# | Subclassing is creating a derivative work. Therefore, the terms of the
# | GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPL[-'-]ed
# | class.
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Subclassing is creating a derivative work. Therefore, the terms of the "
#| "GPL affect the whole program where you create a subclass of a GPL'ed "
@@ -6223,7 +6202,6 @@
# | costs money to get it. Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it
# | available on the Internet? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
# | href=\"#CompanyGPLCostsMoney\" >#CompanyGPLCostsMoney</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "I just found out that a company has a copy of a GPL'ed program, and it "
#| "costs money to get it. Aren't they violating the GPL by not making it "
@@ -6423,7 +6401,6 @@
# | they doing this and is it a violation of those distributors' obligations
# | under GPL? <span class=\"anchor-reference-id\">(<a
# | href=\"#ExportWarranties\" >#ExportWarranties</a>)</span>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Some distributors of GPL'd software require me in their umbrella EULAs or "
#| "as part of their downloading process to “represent and "
Index: software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.2272
retrieving revision 1.2273
diff -u -b -r1.2272 -r1.2273
--- software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po 24 Dec 2018 08:28:59 -0000
1.2272
+++ software/po/recent-releases-include.ru.po 25 Dec 2018 17:18:47 -0000
1.2273
@@ -18,10 +18,9 @@
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
# | <strong>December 2[-3-]{+4+}, 2018</strong>
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid "<strong>December 23, 2018</strong>"
msgid "<strong>December 24, 2018</strong>"
-msgstr "<strong>23 декабÑÑ 2018</strong>"
+msgstr "<strong>24 декабÑÑ 2018</strong>"
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><ul><li>
# | <a
@@ -29,7 +28,6 @@
# |
{+href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-12/msg00016.html\";>GNU+}
# | Linux-libre [-4.19-gnu</a>,-] {+4.20-gnu: Four.Two-Oh! Ho! Ho!</a>,+}
# | <i>Alexandre Oliva</i>, [-<tt>16:12</tt>-] {+<tt>02:51</tt>+}
-#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<a href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-10/msg00002.html";
#| "\">GNU Linux-libre 4.19-gnu</a>, <i>Alexandre Oliva</i>, <tt>16:12</tt>"
@@ -38,8 +36,8 @@
"\">GNU Linux-libre 4.20-gnu: Four.Two-Oh! Ho! Ho!</a>, <i>Alexandre Oliva</"
"i>, <tt>02:51</tt>"
msgstr ""
-"<a href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-10/msg00002.html";
-"\">ÐÑÑел GNU Linux-libre 4.19-gnu</a>, <i>ÐлекÑандÑ
Ðлива</i>, <tt>16:12</tt>"
+"<a href=\"http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-12/msg00016.html";
+"\">ÐÑÑел GNU Linux-libre 4.20-gnu</a>, <i>ÐлекÑандÑ
Ðлива</i>, <tt>02:51</tt>"
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
msgid "<strong>December 23, 2018</strong>"
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www licenses/po/gpl-faq.ru.po software/po/recen...,
Ineiev <=