[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www philosophy/free-software-even-more-importan...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www philosophy/free-software-even-more-importan... |
|
Date: |
Wed, 8 Nov 2017 07:01:58 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 17/11/08 07:01:57
Modified files:
philosophy : free-software-even-more-important.es.html
network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html
philosophy/po : free-software-even-more-important.es-en.html
free-software-even-more-important.es.po
network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html
proprietary : malware-microsoft.es.html
proprietary/po : malware-microsoft.es-en.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-microsoft.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.43&r2=1.44
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.42&r2=1.43
Patches:
Index: philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.es.html 11 Oct 2017
17:00:50 -0000 1.16
+++ philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.es.html 8 Nov 2017
12:01:56 -0000 1.17
@@ -38,11 +38,10 @@
<p>Esos dos programas, que no son libres, tienen algo más en común: ambos son
<cite>malware</cite>. Es decir, ambos contienen funcionalidades que están
diseñadas para maltratar al usuario. Hoy en dÃa el software privativo a
-menudo es <cite>malware</cite> porque <a
-href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">el poder que tienen los desarrolladores
-los corrompe</a>. Ese directorio contiene alrededor de 300 funcionalidades
-maliciosas diferentes (hasta abril de 2017), pero seguramente eso es solo la
-punta del iceberg.</p>
+menudo es <cite>malware</cite> porque <a href="/malware/">el poder que
+tienen los desarrolladores los corrompe</a>. Ese directorio contiene
+alrededor de 300 funcionalidades maliciosas diferentes (hasta abril de
+2017), pero seguramente eso es solo la punta del iceberg.</p>
<p>Con el software libre los usuarios tienen el control del programa, tanto
individualmente como en forma colectiva. AsÃ, controlan lo que hace el
@@ -53,8 +52,8 @@
<p>Con el software privativo el programa controla a los usuarios, y alguna otra
entidad (el desarrollador o «propietario») controla el programa. De modo que
el programa privativo da al desarrollador poder sobre los usuarios. Eso en
-sà mismo es injusto, y el desarrollador se ve tentado a maltratar a los
-usuarios de otras maneras. </p>
+sà mismo es injusto; además, el desarrollador se ve tentado a maltratar a
+los usuarios de otras maneras.</p>
<p>Incluso cuando el software privativo no es totalmente malicioso, sus
desarrolladores se ven incentivados a hacerlo <a
@@ -393,7 +392,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2017/10/11 17:00:50 $
+$Date: 2017/11/08 12:01:56 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file:
/web/www/www/philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html 18 Nov 2016
07:32:46 -0000 1.24
+++ philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es.html 8 Nov 2017
12:01:56 -0000 1.25
@@ -131,8 +131,7 @@
href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">GPL Affero de GNU </a>, ya que
evidentemente son útiles en los servidores.</p>
-<p><small><a href="/licenses/why-affero-gpl.html">¿Por qué la GPL
-Affero?</a></small></p>
+<p><a href="/licenses/why-affero-gpl.html">¿Por qué la GPL Affero?</a></p>
<p>AsÃ, no tenemos ninguna regla que indique que los sistemas libres no deben
usar (o no deben depender de) los servicios (o sitios) implementados con
@@ -204,7 +203,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2012, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2012, 2016, 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
@@ -219,7 +218,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2016/11/18 07:32:46 $
+$Date: 2017/11/08 12:01:56 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file:
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es-en.html 28 Aug 2017
09:59:27 -0000 1.12
+++ philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es-en.html 8 Nov 2017
12:01:57 -0000 1.13
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
<p>Those two nonfree programs have something else in common: they are
both <em>malware</em>. That is, both have functionalities designed to
mistreat the user. Proprietary software nowadays is often malware
-because <a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">the developers' power
+because <a href="/malware/">the developers' power
corrupts them</a>. That directory lists around 300 different
malicious functionalities (as of Apr 2017), but it is surely just the
tip of the iceberg.</p>
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
<p>With proprietary software, the program controls the users, and some
other entity (the developer or “owner”) controls the
program. So the proprietary program gives its developer power over
-its users. That is unjust in itself, and tempts the developer to
+its users. That is unjust in itself; moreover, it tempts the developer to
mistreat the users in other ways.</p>
<p>Even when proprietary software isn't downright malicious, its
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/08/28 09:59:27 $
+$Date: 2017/11/08 12:01:57 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es.po 8 Nov 2017
11:47:53 -0000 1.37
+++ philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.es.po 8 Nov 2017
12:01:57 -0000 1.38
@@ -79,9 +79,9 @@
"should have."
msgstr ""
"A veces también lo llamamos «libre» para enfatizar que nos referimos a la "
-"libertad, y no al precio <a href=\"#TransNote1\" id=\"TransNote1-rev"
-"\"><sup>[1]</sup></a>. Algunos programas privativos, como Photoshop, son muy "
-"caros; otros, como Flash Player, son gratuitos, pero eso es un detalle sin "
+"libertad, y no al precio <a href=\"#TransNote1\" id=\"TransNote1-rev\"><sup>"
+"[1]</sup></a>. Algunos programas privativos, como Photoshop, son muy caros; "
+"otros, como Flash Player, son gratuitos, pero eso es un detalle sin "
"importancia. En ambos casos esos programas someten a los usuarios al poder "
"del desarrollador del programa, poder que nadie deberÃa tener."
Index: philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file:
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html 18 Nov
2016 07:32:59 -0000 1.17
+++ philosophy/po/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.es-en.html 8 Nov
2017 12:01:57 -0000 1.18
@@ -121,8 +121,8 @@
the <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">GNU Affero
GPL</a>, since evidently they are useful on servers.</p>
-<p><small><a href="/licenses/why-affero-gpl.html">Why the Affero
-GPL?</a></small></p>
+<p><a href="/licenses/why-affero-gpl.html">Why the Affero
+GPL?</a></p>
<p>Thus, we don't have a rule that free systems shouldn't use (or
shouldn't depend on) services (or sites) implemented with nonfree
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2012, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2012, 2016, 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/11/18 07:32:59 $
+$Date: 2017/11/08 12:01:57 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary/malware-microsoft.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-microsoft.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -b -r1.43 -r1.44
--- proprietary/malware-microsoft.es.html 11 Sep 2017 08:07:51 -0000
1.43
+++ proprietary/malware-microsoft.es.html 8 Nov 2017 12:01:57 -0000
1.44
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@
<li><p>
Durante meses, Microsoft <a
-href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/sep/11/microsoft-downloading-windows-1";>
+href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/feb/02/microsoft-downloading-windows-10-automatic-update";>
ha estado engañando a los usuarios para que «actualizaran» a Windows 10</a>,
si no prestaban atención y no lo rechazaban explÃcitamente.
</p></li>
@@ -300,6 +300,15 @@
<ul>
+<li><p>El programa de telemetrÃa de Windows 10 envÃa a Microsoft
información acerca
+del ordenador del usuario y del uso que este hace de él.</p>
+
+<p>Más aún, para los usuarios que instalasen la cuarta actualización
estable de
+Windows 10, llamada «Creators Update», Windows elevó la vigilancia al
máximo
+<a
+href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/10/dutch-privacy-regulator-says-that-windows-10-breaks-the-law";>
+ajustando por defecto el nivel de telemetrÃa a «Completo»</a>.</p></li>
+
<li><p>Los archivos DRM de Windows <a
href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/02/02/231229/windows-drm-protected-files-used-to-decloak-tor-browser-users";>pueden
utilizarse para identificar a gente que está navegando mediante
@@ -532,7 +541,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2017/09/11 08:07:51 $
+$Date: 2017/11/08 12:01:57 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -b -r1.42 -r1.43
--- proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.es-en.html 11 Sep 2017 08:07:52 -0000
1.42
+++ proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.es-en.html 8 Nov 2017 12:01:57 -0000
1.43
@@ -271,6 +271,15 @@
<ul>
+<li><p>Windows 10 telemetry program sends information to Microsoft about the
+user's computer and their use of the computer.</p>
+
+<p>Furthermore, for users who installed the fourth stable build of
+Windows 10, called the “Creators Update,” Windows maximized the
+surveillance <a
+href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/10/dutch-privacy-regulator-says-that-windows-10-breaks-the-law";>
+by force setting the telemetry mode to “Full”</a>.</p></li>
+
<li><p>Windows DRM
files <a
href="https://yro.slashdot.org/story/17/02/02/231229/windows-drm-protected-files-used-to-decloak-tor-browser-users";>can
be used to identify people browsing through Tor</a>. The vulnerability
@@ -469,7 +478,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/09/11 08:07:52 $
+$Date: 2017/11/08 12:01:57 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>