[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy categories.html
From: |
Pavel Kharitonov |
Subject: |
www/philosophy categories.html |
Date: |
Mon, 8 May 2017 08:03:59 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev> 17/05/08 08:03:59
Modified files:
philosophy : categories.html
Log message:
Update internal URLs; remove unneeded space.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/categories.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.94&r2=1.95
Patches:
Index: categories.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/categories.html,v
retrieving revision 1.94
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -b -r1.94 -r1.95
--- categories.html 18 Nov 2016 06:31:39 -0000 1.94
+++ categories.html 8 May 2017 12:03:59 -0000 1.95
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.83 -->
<title>Categories of Free and Nonfree Software
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<style type="text/css" media="screen">
@@ -92,8 +92,8 @@
accepted. However, the differences in extension of the
category are small: nearly all free software is open source,
and nearly all open source software is free.</p>
- <p>We prefer the term “<a href=
- "/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">free
+ <p>We prefer the term “<a
+ href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">free
software</a>” because it refers to
freedom—something that the term “open
source“ does not do.</p>
@@ -145,12 +145,12 @@
<p>Some copyleft licenses, such as GPL version 3, block
other means of turning software proprietary, such as <a
- href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html">tivoization</a>.</p>
+ href="/licenses/rms-why-gplv3.html">tivoization</a>.</p>
<p>In the GNU Project, we copyleft almost all the software we
write, because our goal is to give <em>every</em> user the freedoms
- implied by the term “free software.” See our <a href=
- "/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft article</a> for more explanation of
+ implied by the term “free software.” See our <a
+ href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft article</a> for more
explanation of
how copyleft works and why we use it.</p>
<p>Copyleft is a general concept; to copyleft an actual program,
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
many possible ways to write copyleft distribution terms, so in
principle there can be many copyleft free software licenses.
However, in actual practice nearly all copylefted software uses the
- <a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU General Public
+ <a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GNU General Public
License</a>. Two different copyleft licenses are usually
“incompatible”, which means it is illegal to merge
the code using one license with the code using the other
@@ -196,13 +196,13 @@
<h3 id="LaxPermissiveLicensedSoftware">Lax permissive licensed software</h3>
<p>Lax permissive licenses include the X11 license and the
- <a href="bsd.html">two BSD licenses</a>. These licenses permit
+ <a href="/licenses/bsd.html">two BSD licenses</a>. These licenses
permit
almost any use of the code, including distributing proprietary
binaries with or without changing the source code.</p>
<h3 id="GPL-CoveredSoftware">GPL-covered software</h3>
- <p>The <a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU GPL (General Public
+ <p>The <a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GNU GPL (General Public
License)</a> is one specific set of distribution terms for
copylefting a program. The GNU Project uses it as the distribution
terms for most GNU software.</p>
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@
Directory</a> identifies all GNU packages.</p>
<p>Most GNU software is <a href=
- "/copyleft/copyleft.html">copylefted</a>, but not all; however,
+ "/licenses/copyleft.html">copylefted</a>, but not all; however,
all GNU software must be <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free
software</a>.</p>
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
<p>Proprietary software is another name for nonfree software.
In the past we subdivided nonfree software into
“semifree software”, which could be modified and
- redistributed noncommercially, and “ proprietary
+ redistributed noncommercially, and “proprietary
software”, which could not be. But we have dropped that
distinction and now use “proprietary software” as
synonymous with nonfree software.</p>
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/11/18 06:31:39 $
+$Date: 2017/05/08 12:03:59 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
- www/philosophy categories.html,
Pavel Kharitonov <=