[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/proprietary proprietary-insecurity.ja.html ...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/proprietary proprietary-insecurity.ja.html ... |
|
Date: |
Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:29:46 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 17/04/30 18:29:46
Modified files:
proprietary : proprietary-insecurity.ja.html
proprietary/po : proprietary-insecurity.de.po
proprietary-insecurity.fr.po
proprietary-insecurity.it.po
proprietary-insecurity.ja-diff.html
proprietary-insecurity.ja.po
proprietary-insecurity.pot
proprietary-insecurity.ru.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary-insecurity.ja.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.70&r2=1.71
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.87&r2=1.88
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.94&r2=1.95
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.ja-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.75&r2=1.76
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.45&r2=1.46
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.109&r2=1.110
Patches:
Index: proprietary-insecurity.ja.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary-insecurity.ja.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- proprietary-insecurity.ja.html 24 Apr 2017 03:31:02 -0000 1.20
+++ proprietary-insecurity.ja.html 30 Apr 2017 22:29:46 -0000 1.21
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.ja.po</a>'
--><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/proprietary/proprietary-insecurity.html"
--><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.ja-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-02-23" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/proprietary/proprietary-insecurity.en.html" -->
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-02-23" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ja.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
æçµæ´æ°:
-$Date: 2017/04/24 03:31:02 $
+$Date: 2017/04/30 22:29:46 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/proprietary-insecurity.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.70
retrieving revision 1.71
diff -u -b -r1.70 -r1.71
--- po/proprietary-insecurity.de.po 13 Apr 2017 23:29:47 -0000 1.70
+++ po/proprietary-insecurity.de.po 30 Apr 2017 22:29:46 -0000 1.71
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-insecurity.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: Webmasters <address@hidden>\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-13 23:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-10-29 22:00+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Jоегg Kоhпе <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -60,12 +60,40 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious idea "
-"of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and any "
-"system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself is not "
-"culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping "
-"holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the users are helpless "
-"to fix them</em>."
+"It is incorrect to compare free software with a fictitious idea of "
+"proprietary software as perfect, but the press often implicitly does that "
+"whenever a security hole in a free program is discovered. The examples "
+"below show that proprietary software isn't perfect, and is often quite "
+"sloppy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | It would be {+equally+} incorrect to compare proprietary software with a
+# | fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has
+# | bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security [-holes.
+# | That in itself-] {+errors. To err+} is {+human, and+} not culpable. But
+# | proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping holes, or even
+# | introduce them [-deliberately, and <em>the-] {+deliberately. In any case,
+# | they keep+} users [-are-] {+<em>the+} helpless to fix [-them</em>.-] {+any
+# | security problems that arise</em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's
+# | culpable about proprietary software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious "
+#| "idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and "
+#| "any system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself "
+#| "is not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+#| "disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the "
+#| "users are helpless to fix them</em>."
+msgid ""
+"It would be equally incorrect to compare proprietary software with a "
+"fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has "
+"bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security errors. To err "
+"is human, and not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+"disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately. In any case, "
+"they keep users <em>the helpless to fix any security problems that arise</"
+"em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's culpable about proprietary "
+"software."
msgstr ""
"Es wäre falsch, proprietäre Software mit einer fiktiven Vorstellung zu "
"vergleichen, <em>Freie Software</em> sei perfekt. Jedes nicht triviale "
Index: po/proprietary-insecurity.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.87
retrieving revision 1.88
diff -u -b -r1.87 -r1.88
--- po/proprietary-insecurity.fr.po 14 Apr 2017 09:59:10 -0000 1.87
+++ po/proprietary-insecurity.fr.po 30 Apr 2017 22:29:46 -0000 1.88
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-insecurity.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-13 23:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-04-14 11:51+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -62,12 +63,40 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious idea "
-"of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and any "
-"system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself is not "
-"culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping "
-"holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the users are helpless "
-"to fix them</em>."
+"It is incorrect to compare free software with a fictitious idea of "
+"proprietary software as perfect, but the press often implicitly does that "
+"whenever a security hole in a free program is discovered. The examples "
+"below show that proprietary software isn't perfect, and is often quite "
+"sloppy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | It would be {+equally+} incorrect to compare proprietary software with a
+# | fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has
+# | bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security [-holes.
+# | That in itself-] {+errors. To err+} is {+human, and+} not culpable. But
+# | proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping holes, or even
+# | introduce them [-deliberately, and <em>the-] {+deliberately. In any case,
+# | they keep+} users [-are-] {+<em>the+} helpless to fix [-them</em>.-] {+any
+# | security problems that arise</em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's
+# | culpable about proprietary software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious "
+#| "idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and "
+#| "any system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself "
+#| "is not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+#| "disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the "
+#| "users are helpless to fix them</em>."
+msgid ""
+"It would be equally incorrect to compare proprietary software with a "
+"fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has "
+"bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security errors. To err "
+"is human, and not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+"disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately. In any case, "
+"they keep users <em>the helpless to fix any security problems that arise</"
+"em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's culpable about proprietary "
+"software."
msgstr ""
"Il ne serait pas juste de comparer le logiciel privateur avec un logiciel "
"libre idéal réputé parfait. Chaque programme un peu complexe a ses bogues
et "
Index: po/proprietary-insecurity.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.94
retrieving revision 1.95
diff -u -b -r1.94 -r1.95
--- po/proprietary-insecurity.it.po 29 Apr 2017 11:32:43 -0000 1.94
+++ po/proprietary-insecurity.it.po 30 Apr 2017 22:29:46 -0000 1.95
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-insecurity.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-13 23:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-04-29 12:58+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.5.4\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -61,12 +62,40 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious idea "
-"of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and any "
-"system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself is not "
-"culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping "
-"holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the users are helpless "
-"to fix them</em>."
+"It is incorrect to compare free software with a fictitious idea of "
+"proprietary software as perfect, but the press often implicitly does that "
+"whenever a security hole in a free program is discovered. The examples "
+"below show that proprietary software isn't perfect, and is often quite "
+"sloppy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | It would be {+equally+} incorrect to compare proprietary software with a
+# | fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has
+# | bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security [-holes.
+# | That in itself-] {+errors. To err+} is {+human, and+} not culpable. But
+# | proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping holes, or even
+# | introduce them [-deliberately, and <em>the-] {+deliberately. In any case,
+# | they keep+} users [-are-] {+<em>the+} helpless to fix [-them</em>.-] {+any
+# | security problems that arise</em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's
+# | culpable about proprietary software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious "
+#| "idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and "
+#| "any system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself "
+#| "is not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+#| "disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the "
+#| "users are helpless to fix them</em>."
+msgid ""
+"It would be equally incorrect to compare proprietary software with a "
+"fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has "
+"bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security errors. To err "
+"is human, and not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+"disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately. In any case, "
+"they keep users <em>the helpless to fix any security problems that arise</"
+"em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's culpable about proprietary "
+"software."
msgstr ""
"Sarebbe sbagliato comparare il software proprietario con un'idea fittizia di "
"software libero perfetto. Ogni programma non banale ha bug, ed ogni sistema, "
Index: po/proprietary-insecurity.ja-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.ja-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- po/proprietary-insecurity.ja-diff.html 24 Apr 2017 03:31:03 -0000
1.2
+++ po/proprietary-insecurity.ja-diff.html 30 Apr 2017 22:29:46 -0000
1.3
@@ -31,12 +31,22 @@
proprietary software that has grave consequences or is otherwise
noteworthy.</p>
-<p>It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a
-fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program
-has bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security
-holes. That in itself is not culpable. But proprietary software
-developers frequently disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them
-deliberately, and <em>the users are helpless to fix
them</em>.</p>
+<p>It <span class="inserted"><ins><em>is incorrect to compare free
software with a fictitious idea of
+proprietary software as perfect, but the press often implicitly does
+that whenever a security hole in a free program is discovered. The
+examples below show that proprietary software isn't perfect, and
+is often quite sloppy.</p>
+
+<p>It</em></ins></span> would be <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>equally</em></ins></span> incorrect to compare
proprietary software with
+a fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial
+program has bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have
+security
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>holes. That in
itself</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>errors. To
err</em></ins></span> is <span class="inserted"><ins><em>human,
and</em></ins></span> not culpable. But proprietary
+software developers frequently disregard gaping holes, or even
+introduce them
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>deliberately, and
<em>the</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>deliberately. In any case, they
keep</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em><em>the</em></ins></span>
+helpless to fix <span
class="removed"><del><strong>them</em>.</p></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>any security problems that arise</em>.
Keeping the
+users helpless is what's culpable about proprietary
software.</p></em></ins></span>
<ul>
<li>
@@ -460,7 +470,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/04/24 03:31:03 $
+$Date: 2017/04/30 22:29:46 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/proprietary-insecurity.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.75
retrieving revision 1.76
diff -u -b -r1.75 -r1.76
--- po/proprietary-insecurity.ja.po 13 Apr 2017 23:29:47 -0000 1.75
+++ po/proprietary-insecurity.ja.po 30 Apr 2017 22:29:46 -0000 1.76
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-insecurity.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-13 23:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-10-31 12:56+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -59,12 +59,31 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious idea "
-"of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and any "
-"system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself is not "
-"culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping "
-"holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the users are helpless "
-"to fix them</em>."
+"It is incorrect to compare free software with a fictitious idea of "
+"proprietary software as perfect, but the press often implicitly does that "
+"whenever a security hole in a free program is discovered. The examples "
+"below show that proprietary software isn't perfect, and is often quite "
+"sloppy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious "
+#| "idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and "
+#| "any system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself "
+#| "is not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+#| "disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the "
+#| "users are helpless to fix them</em>."
+msgid ""
+"It would be equally incorrect to compare proprietary software with a "
+"fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has "
+"bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security errors. To err "
+"is human, and not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+"disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately. In any case, "
+"they keep users <em>the helpless to fix any security problems that arise</"
+"em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's culpable about proprietary "
+"software."
msgstr ""
"ãããã©ã¤ã¨ã¿ãªãªã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ããèªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ãå®ç§ã¨ããæ¶ç©ºã®èãã¨æ¯"
"è¼ããã®ã¯æ£ç¢ºã§ã¯ãªãã§ããããäºç´°ã§ã¯ãªãããã¹ã¦ã®ããã°ã©ã
ã«ã¯ãã°ãæ"
Index: po/proprietary-insecurity.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -b -r1.45 -r1.46
--- po/proprietary-insecurity.pot 13 Apr 2017 23:29:47 -0000 1.45
+++ po/proprietary-insecurity.pot 30 Apr 2017 22:29:46 -0000 1.46
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-insecurity.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-13 23:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -48,12 +48,23 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious idea "
-"of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and any "
-"system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself is not "
-"culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping "
-"holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the users are helpless "
-"to fix them</em>."
+"It is incorrect to compare free software with a fictitious idea of "
+"proprietary software as perfect, but the press often implicitly does that "
+"whenever a security hole in a free program is discovered. The examples "
+"below show that proprietary software isn't perfect, and is often quite "
+"sloppy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"It would be equally incorrect to compare proprietary software with a "
+"fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has "
+"bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security errors. To err "
+"is human, and not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+"disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately. In any case, "
+"they keep users <em>the helpless to fix any security problems that "
+"arise</em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's culpable about proprietary "
+"software."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
Index: po/proprietary-insecurity.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-insecurity.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.109
retrieving revision 1.110
diff -u -b -r1.109 -r1.110
--- po/proprietary-insecurity.ru.po 14 Apr 2017 07:00:47 -0000 1.109
+++ po/proprietary-insecurity.ru.po 30 Apr 2017 22:29:46 -0000 1.110
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: proprietary-insecurity.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-13 23:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-04-01 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-04-30 22:26+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "Proprietary Insecurity - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -60,12 +61,40 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious idea "
-"of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and any "
-"system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself is not "
-"culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping "
-"holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the users are helpless "
-"to fix them</em>."
+"It is incorrect to compare free software with a fictitious idea of "
+"proprietary software as perfect, but the press often implicitly does that "
+"whenever a security hole in a free program is discovered. The examples "
+"below show that proprietary software isn't perfect, and is often quite "
+"sloppy."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | It would be {+equally+} incorrect to compare proprietary software with a
+# | fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has
+# | bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security [-holes.
+# | That in itself-] {+errors. To err+} is {+human, and+} not culpable. But
+# | proprietary software developers frequently disregard gaping holes, or even
+# | introduce them [-deliberately, and <em>the-] {+deliberately. In any case,
+# | they keep+} users [-are-] {+<em>the+} helpless to fix [-them</em>.-] {+any
+# | security problems that arise</em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's
+# | culpable about proprietary software.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "It would be incorrect to compare proprietary software with a fictitious "
+#| "idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has bugs, and "
+#| "any system, free or proprietary, may have security holes. That in itself "
+#| "is not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+#| "disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately, and <em>the "
+#| "users are helpless to fix them</em>."
+msgid ""
+"It would be equally incorrect to compare proprietary software with a "
+"fictitious idea of free software as perfect. Every nontrivial program has "
+"bugs, and any system, free or proprietary, may have security errors. To err "
+"is human, and not culpable. But proprietary software developers frequently "
+"disregard gaping holes, or even introduce them deliberately. In any case, "
+"they keep users <em>the helpless to fix any security problems that arise</"
+"em>. Keeping the users helpless is what's culpable about proprietary "
+"software."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑло Ð±Ñ Ð½ÐµÐ²ÐµÑно ÑÑавниваÑÑ Ð½ÐµÑвободнÑе
пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ñ ÑмозÑиÑелÑной идеей "
"ÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑамм как ÑовеÑÑенÑÑва. Ð
лÑбой неÑÑивиалÑной пÑогÑамме еÑÑÑ "