[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/proprietary proprietary-sabotage.de.html po...
From: |
GNUN |
Subject: |
www/proprietary proprietary-sabotage.de.html po... |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:59:00 +0000 (UTC) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 16/08/27 03:59:00
Modified files:
proprietary : proprietary-sabotage.de.html
Added files:
proprietary/po : proprietary-sabotage.de-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary-sabotage.de.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary-sabotage.de-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: proprietary-sabotage.de.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary-sabotage.de.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- proprietary-sabotage.de.html 20 Jun 2016 02:30:20 -0000 1.14
+++ proprietary-sabotage.de.html 27 Aug 2016 03:58:59 -0000 1.15
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/proprietary/proprietary-sabotage.en.html"
-->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/proprietary/po/proprietary-sabotage.de.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/po/proprietary-sabotage.de.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/proprietary/proprietary-sabotage.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/proprietary/po/proprietary-sabotage.de-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-06-28" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/proprietary/proprietary-sabotage.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.de.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/proprietary/po/proprietary-sabotage.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.de.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.de.html" -->
<h2>Proprietäre Sabotage</h2>
<a href="/proprietary/">Weitere Beispiele proprietärer Schadsoftware</a>
@@ -374,7 +380,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualisierung:
-$Date: 2016/06/20 02:30:20 $
+$Date: 2016/08/27 03:58:59 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/proprietary-sabotage.de-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/proprietary-sabotage.de-diff.html
diff -N po/proprietary-sabotage.de-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/proprietary-sabotage.de-diff.html 27 Aug 2016 03:59:00 -0000
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,301 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/proprietary/proprietary-sabotage.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
+
+<title>Proprietary Sabotage - GNU Project - Free Software
Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/proprietary/po/proprietary-sabotage.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Proprietary Sabotage</h2>
+
+<a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">Other examples of proprietary
malware</a>
+
+<p>Here are examples of proprietary software that has something
+worse than a back door.</p>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>
+ <p>Once Microsoft has tricked a user into accepting installation
+ of Windows
+ 10, <a
href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/06/01/windows_10_nagware_no_way_out/">they
+ find that they are denied the option to cancel or even postpone
+ the imposed date of installation</a>.</p>
+
+ <p>This demonstrates what we've said for years: using
+ proprietary software means letting someone have power over you,
+ and you're going to get screwed sooner or later.</p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
+ <p>The Apple Music client
+ program <a
href="https://blog.vellumatlanta.com/2016/05/04/apple-stole-my-music-no-seriously/">scans
+ the user's file system for music files, copies them to an Apple
+ server, and deletes them</a>.</p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
+ <p>Apple <a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20160608183145/http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/04/14/uninstall_quicktime_for_windows/">
+stops users from fixing the security bugs in Quicktime for
+ Windows</a>, while refusing to fix them itself.</p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
+ <p>iOS version 9 for
+ iThings <a
href="https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/feb/05/error-53-apple-iphone-software-update-handset-worthless-third-party-repair">sabotages
+ them irreparably if they were repaired by someone other than
+ Apple</a>. Apple eventually backed off from this policy under
+ criticism from the users. However, it has not acknowledged that
+ this was wrong.</p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
+ <p>Phillips “smart” lightbulbs had initially been
+ designed to interact with other companies' smart light bulbs, but <a
+
href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20151214/07452133070/lightbulb-drm-philips-locks-purchasers-out-third-party-bulbs-with-firmware-update.shtml">
+ later the company updated the firmware to disallow
interoperability</a>.</p>
+
+ <p>If a product is “smart”, and you didn't build it, it is
+ cleverly serving its manufacturer <em>against you</em>.</p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li>
+ <span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Whether you like it or not,
Microsoft</strong></del></span>
+ <span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Microsoft</em></ins></span>
+ is <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/3012278/microsoft-windows/microsoft-sets-stage-for-massive-windows-10-upgrade-strategy.html">forcibly
+ pushing Windows</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://gizmodo.com/woman-wins-10-000-from-microsoft-after-unwanted-window-1782666146">
+ forcibly
+ pushing</a> <a
href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/3012278/microsoft-windows/microsoft-sets-stage-for-massive-windows-10-upgrade-strategy.html">Windows</em></ins></span>
+ update to its version 10</a>, ignoring the flag on Windows 7 or 8
+ that you could set to not upgrade. This reaffirms the presence of
+ a <a href="/proprietary/proprietary-back-doors.html">universal
+ back door in Windows</a> 7 and 8.</p>
+ </li>
+
+ <li><p>Windows 10 “upgrades” <a
+
href="http://www.ghacks.net/2015/11/24/beware-latest-windows-10-update-may-remove-programs-automatically/">
+ delete applications</a> without asking permission.</p>
+ </li>
+ <li><p>Google has long had <a
+
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/nov/24/google-can-unlock-android-devices-remotely-if-phone-unencrypted">a
+ back door to remotely unlock an Android device</a>, unless its
+ disk is encrypted (possible since Android 5.0 Lollipop, but
+ still not quite the default).</p></li>
+<li><p>
+Users report <a
href="http://www.networkworld.com/article/2993490/windows/windows-10-upgrades-reportedly-appearing-as-mandatory-for-some-users.html#tk.rss_all">
+Microsoft is forcing them to replace Windows 7 and 8 with
+all-spying Windows 10</a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+This seems to involve use of a back door in Windows 7 and 8.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+<a
href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2984889/windows-pcs/lenovo-collects-usage-data-on-thinkpad-thinkcentre-and-thinkstation-pcs.html">
+Lenovo stealthily installed crapware and spyware via BIOS</a> on Windows
installs.
+Note that the specific sabotage method Lenovo used did not affect
+GNU/Linux; also, a “clean” Windows install is not really
+clean since <a href="/proprietary/malware-microsoft.html">Microsoft
+puts in its own malware</a>.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>Vizio
+<a
href="http://boingboing.net/2015/04/30/telescreen-watch-vizio-adds-s.html">
+used a firmware “upgrade” to make its TVs snoop on what users
watch</a>.
+The TVs did not do that when first sold.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>Amazon
+<a
href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150321/13350230396/while-bricking-jailbroken-fire-tvs-last-year-amazon-did-same-to-kindle-devices.shtml">
+downgraded the software in users' Swindles</a>
+so that those already rooted would cease to function at
all.</p></li>
+
+<li><p>Apple <a
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/dec/04/apple-deleted-music-ipods-rivals-steve-jobs">deleted
+from iPods the music that users had got from internet music stores
+that competed with iTunes</a>.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+<a
href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/how-can-any-company-ever-trust-microsoft-again-3569376/">Microsoft
+informs the NSA of bugs in Windows before fixing them.</a>
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+<a
href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/10/nintendo-updates-take-wii-u-hostage-until-you-agree-new-legal-terms">Nintendo
+remotely sabotaged all Wiis, making them refuse to work unless the
+user agrees to a new EULA.</a>
+</p>
+<p>We can be quite sure this EULA is is unjust because injustice is
+the only motive for imposing an EULA.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+FTDI's proprietary driver for its USB-to-serial chips has been
+designed to
+<a
href="http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/10/windows-update-drivers-bricking-usb-serial-chips-beloved-of-hardware-hackers/">sabotage
+alternative compatible chips</a> so that they no longer work. Microsoft
is <a
href="http://it.slashdot.org/story/16/01/31/1720259/ftdi-driver-breaks-hardware-again">installing
this automatically</a> as an
+“upgrade”.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+<a
href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/blogs/open-enterprise/windows-xp-end-of-an-era-end-of-an-error-3569489/">Microsoft
+cut off security fixes for Windows XP, except to some big
+ users that pay exorbitantly.</a></p>
+
+<p>Microsoft is going to
+ <a
href="http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/security/3605515/more-than-half-of-all-ie-users-face-patch-axe-in-10-months/">
+ cut off support for some Internet Explorer versions</a> in the same
way.</p>
+
+<p>A person or company has the right to cease to work on a
+particular program; the wrong here is Microsoft does this after having
+made the users dependent on Microsoft, because they are not free to ask
+anyone else to work on the program for them.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+<a
href="http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security">The
+NSA has put back doors into nonfree encryption software.</a>
+We don't know which ones they are, but we can be sure they include
+some widely used systems. This reinforces the point that you can never
+trust the security of nonfree software.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+<a
href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2541250/apple-mac/update--apple-plays-hardball--upgrade--bricks--unlocked-iphones.html">An
+Apple firmware “upgrade” bricked iPhones that had been
+unlocked.</a> The “upgrade” also deactivated applications
+not approved by <a href="/proprietary/proprietary-jails.html">Apple
+censorship</a>. All this was apparently intentional.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+Some
+proprietary <a
href="http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/19/apple-talking-cats-in-app-purchases">games
+lure children to spend their parents' money</a>.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+Adobe applications have time bombs:
+they <a
href="http://techcrunch.com/2013/05/06/adobe-goes-all-in-with-subscription-based-creative-cloud-will-stop-selling-regular-cs-licenses-shrink-wrapped-boxes/">stop
+working after a certain time</a>, after which the user must pay to
+extend the time.</p>
+
+<p>Once there was a problem with the servers that these programs use
+to check who has paid, and
+<a
href="http://www.macuser.co.uk/9015-adobe-creative-cloud-outage-leaves-adobe-users-locked-out">the
applications refused to work for anyone</a>.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>
+Sony <a
href="https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/03/sony-steals-feature-from-your-playstation-3">sabotaged
+the Playstation 3</a> with a firmware downgrade that removed the
+feature that allowed users to run GNU/Linux on it.</p>
+
+<p>Sony subsequently sent police after Geohot, after he cracked the
+code that blocked users from changing the firmware, and we responded by
+calling for a <a href="http://boycottsony.org">boycott of
+Sony </a>.
+<span class="removed"><del><strong></p></li></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em></p>
+
+<p>In a court settlement Sony is <a
href="http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/06/if-you-used-to-run-linux-on-your-ps3-you-could-get-55-from-sony/">
+now paying for the sabotage</a>.</p></li></em></ins></span>
+
+<li><p>
+LG <a
href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140511/17430627199/lg-will-take-smart-out-your-smart-tv-if-you-dont-agree-to-share-your-viewing-search-data-with-third-parties.shtml">disabled
+network features</a> on <em>previously purchased</em>
+“smart” TVs, unless the purchasers agreed to let LG
+begin to snoop on them and distribute their personal data.
+</p></li>
+
+<li><p>Oracle's nonfree Java plug-in for browsers <a
+href="http://www.zdnet.com/article/a-close-look-at-how-oracle-installs-deceptive-software-with-java-updates/">sneakily
installs other annoying proprietary software</a>.</p>
+
+<p>That article disregards all other bad things about proprietary
software. For
+instance, it regards the inclusion of proprietary Flash Player (which has a
<a
+href="http://www.imasuper.com/66/technology/flash-cookies-the-silent-privacy-killer/">surveillance
feature</a> and DRM) in Chrome as a good thing. Chrome
+is a proprietary browser with a universal back door.</p>
+
+<p>We don't agree with the article's views on those issues, but we
present it
+as a factual reference.</p>
+
+<p>In 2014, <a
+href="http://www.computerworld.com/article/2494794/malware-vulnerabilities/oracle-will-continue-to-bundle--crapware--with-java.html">Oracle
insisted on continuing
+this practice.</a></p>
+</li>
+</ul>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 2013, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2016/08/27 03:59:00 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/proprietary proprietary-sabotage.de.html po...,
GNUN <=