www/gnu yes-give-it-away.html why-programs-shou...

[Pavel Kharitonov]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev>       15/12/31 08:07:48

Modified files:
        gnu            : yes-give-it-away.html 
                         why-programs-should-be-shared.html 

Log message:
        fix email address; use &ldquo;...&rdquo; for quotes; maintain double 
spaces between sentences.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/yes-give-it-away.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/why-programs-should-be-shared.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2

Patches:
Index: yes-give-it-away.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/yes-give-it-away.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- yes-give-it-away.html       30 Dec 2015 21:48:15 -0000      1.1
+++ yes-give-it-away.html       31 Dec 2015 08:07:47 -0000      1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<!--#include virtual="/server/html5-header.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.78 -->
 <title>Yes, Give It Away
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
       Unix-like system rather than something like the MIT Lisp Machine.</p>
 
     <p>He had not yet conceptually distinguished the two meanings of
-      "free"; these messages are formulated in terms of gratis copies, but
+      &ldquo;free;&rdquo; these messages are formulated in terms of gratis 
copies, but
       take for granted that this means users also have freedom.</p>
   </blockquote>
 
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.
 There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
 the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
-to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
 
 <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
         replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/12/30 21:48:15 $
+$Date: 2015/12/31 08:07:47 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: why-programs-should-be-shared.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/why-programs-should-be-shared.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- why-programs-should-be-shared.html  30 Dec 2015 21:32:51 -0000      1.1
+++ why-programs-should-be-shared.html  31 Dec 2015 08:07:47 -0000      1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-<!--#include virtual="/server/html5-header.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.78 -->
 <title>Why Programs Should be Shared
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
@@ -16,30 +16,30 @@
       Unix-like system rather than something like the MIT Lisp Machine.</p>
 
     <p>He had not yet conceptually distinguished the two meanings of
-      "free"; these messages are formulated in terms of gratis copies, but
+      &ldquo;free;&rdquo; these messages are formulated in terms of gratis 
copies, but
       take for granted that this means users also have freedom.</p>
   </blockquote>
 
 <p>Five years ago one could take for granted that any useful program
 written at SAIL, MIT, CMU, etc. would be shared.  Since then, these
-universities have started acting just like software houses--everything
+universities have started acting just like software houses&mdash;everything
 useful will be sold for an arm and a leg (usually after being written
 at gov't expense).</p>
 
 <p>People find all sorts of excuses why it's harmful to give away
 software. These supposed problems never bothered us back when we
-WANTED to share, and haven't affected EMACS, so I suspect they are
+<em>wanted</em> to share, and haven't affected EMACS, so I suspect they are
 bogus.</p>
 
 <p>For example, people say that companies will &ldquo;steal&rdquo; it
 and sell it.  If so, that would be no worse than Stanford selling it!
 At least people would have the choice of getting a free copy.  Users
 want to buy maintained software? Then let people sell service
-contracts-- but give the software itself free.</p>
+contracts&mdash;but give the software itself free.</p>
 
 <p>I think I can dispose of any reasons you may think exist
 for not sharing software. But more important is the reason
-why we SHOULD share:</p>
+why we <em>should</em> share:</p>
 
 <p>We would get more done with the same amount of work, if
 artificial obstacles were removed. And we would feel
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
 <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.
 There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
 the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
-to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
 
 <p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
         replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/12/30 21:32:51 $
+$Date: 2015/12/31 08:07:47 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>