www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy luispo-rms-interview.html


From: Pavel Kharitonov
Subject: www/philosophy luispo-rms-interview.html
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:51:04 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev>       13/11/25 10:51:03

Modified files:
        philosophy     : luispo-rms-interview.html 

Log message:
        Update boilerplate to v1.75; update links; fix typos and quoting.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27

Patches:
Index: luispo-rms-interview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- luispo-rms-interview.html   8 Jul 2013 22:55:16 -0000       1.26
+++ luispo-rms-interview.html   25 Nov 2013 10:51:03 -0000      1.27
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<title>Interview: Richard M. Stallman - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation 
(FSF)</title>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
+<title>Interview: Richard M. Stallman
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
 <h2>Interview: Richard M. Stallman</h2>
@@ -12,15 +14,15 @@
 <p>
 Richard M. Stallman is the most forceful and famous
 practitioner/theorist of
-<a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/fsp/glossary/index.html";>free
-software</a>, a termed he coined. &ldquo;Free&rdquo; here means free
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free
+software</a>, a term he coined. &ldquo;Free&rdquo; here means free
 as in &ldquo;free speech,&rdquo; not free as in &ldquo;free
 beer.&rdquo; Stallman's most famous intervention in the &ldquo;free
 software&rdquo; movement has surely been the GNU General Public
-License (<a href="/philosophy/license-list.html">GPL</a>), which
+License (<a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL</a>), which
 Stallman created around 1985 as a general license that could be
 applied to any program. The license codifies the concept of
-&ldquo;<a href="http://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html";>copyleft</a>,&rdquo;
+&ldquo;<a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>,&rdquo;
 the &ldquo;central idea&rdquo; of which Stallman has described as
 giving &ldquo;everyone permission to run the program, copy the
 program, modify the program, and distribute modified versions, but not
@@ -139,7 +141,7 @@
        Etzioni</a> would describe as a communitarianism (see, for instance,
        <a href="http://communitariannetwork.org/about-communitarianism/";>
         http://communitariannetwork.org/about-communitarianism/</a>).
-       And communitariannism is by no means hostile to the market economy that
+       And communitarianism is by no means hostile to the market economy that
        most people associate with capitalism. Quite the opposite. Would you
        speak to what could be called the politics of your ethical system?
 </p></blockquote>
@@ -204,18 +206,18 @@
 href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010515200253/http://stopftaa.org/";>
 opposition to them</a>.
 </p>
-<p>
+<blockquote><p>
 The most immediate criticism of your insistence on ethics would be
 that the ethic of free software is fine, but not relevant to the real
 world of business.
-</p>
+</p></blockquote>
 <p>
 With over half the world's Web sites running on GNU/Linux and
 <a href="http://www.apache.org";>Apache</a>, that is evidently just FUD.
 You should not give such falsehoods credibility by appearing to take them
 seriously yourself.
 </p>
-<p>
+<blockquote><p>
 I think it is worse to leave implicit lies unanswered than to address
 them directly. The thrust of my argument was that Microsoft, for
 instance, would and does claim that free software does not make money
@@ -223,7 +225,7 @@
 think that Microsoft is to be ignored, just as the WTO should not be
 ignored. But: my question was to suggest a rebuttal this self-evident
 FUD, not to credit the errors of others.
-</p>
+</p></blockquote>
 
 <blockquote><p>
        So, I'll rephrase my question: Microsoft has attacked the GPL
@@ -283,7 +285,7 @@
 
 <p>
 In the age of the printing press, that was true:
-<a 
href="http://www.intellectual-property.gov.uk/std/resources/copyright/history.htm";>copyright</a>
+<a href="http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-about/c-history.htm";>copyright</a>
 was an industrial restriction on publishers, requiring them to pay the
 author of a book. It did not restrict the readers, because the actions
 it restricted were things only a publisher could do.
@@ -325,7 +327,7 @@
        are urged to go to the <a href="/home.html">GNU web site</a>,
        and to Stallman's <a href="http://www.stallman.org";>personal
        site</a>. In particular, readers might want to look at
-       &ldquo;<a 
href="http://web.mit.edu/m-i-t/forums/copyright/index_transcript.html";>Copyright
+       &ldquo;<a href="/philosophy/copyright-and-globalization.html">Copyright
        and Globalization in the Age of Computer Networks</a>&rdquo;
        presented at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in
        Cambridge, Massachusetts on 19 April 2001. Discussing his
@@ -377,46 +379,65 @@
 I accomplish mirth. That's the hacker spirit&mdash;Ha Ha, Only Serious.
 </p>
 
-</div>
-
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
 <div id="footer">
 
-<p>
-Please send FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to 
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
+<p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.
 There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a> 
-the FSF.
-<br />
-Please send broken links and other corrections or suggestions to
-<a href="mailto:address@hidden";><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
 
-<p>
-Please see the 
-<a href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting
-translations of this article.
-</p>
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;</a>.</p>
+
+        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see <a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+        README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+     files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+     be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US.  Please do NOT change or remove this
+     without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+     Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+     document.  For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+     document was modified, or published.
+     
+     If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+     Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+     years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+     year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+     being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+     
+     There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+     Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2001, 2007, 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
-<p>
-Copyright &copy; 2001, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110, USA</address>
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.
-</p>
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
 
 <p>Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/07/08 22:55:16 $
+$Date: 2013/11/25 10:51:03 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
-
 </div>
 </body>
 </html>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]