[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy government-free-software.html
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
www/philosophy government-free-software.html |
Date: |
Tue, 21 May 2013 20:16:47 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Richard M. Stallman <rms> 13/05/21 20:16:47
Modified files:
philosophy : government-free-software.html
Log message:
Add bold headings for readability.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/government-free-software.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
Patches:
Index: government-free-software.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/government-free-software.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- government-free-software.html 31 Mar 2013 18:05:09 -0000 1.31
+++ government-free-software.html 21 May 2013 20:16:46 -0000 1.32
@@ -41,38 +41,45 @@
corporations controlled by the state or established with special
privileges or functions by the state.</p>
+<h3>Education</h3>
<p>The most important policy concerns education, since that shapes
the future of the country:</p>
<ul>
-<li>Educational activities, or at least those of state entities, must
+<li><b>Teach only free software</b><br />
+Educational activities, or at least those of state entities, must
teach only free software (thus, they should never lead students to use
a nonfree program), and should teach the civic reasons for insisting
on free software. To teach a nonfree program is to teach dependence,
which is contrary to the mission of the school.</li>
</ul>
+<h3>The State and the Public</h3>
<p>Also crucial are state policies that influence what software
individuals and organizations use:</p>
<ul>
-<li><p>Laws and public sector practices must be changed so that they never
+<li><p><b>Never require nonfree programs</b><br />
+Laws and public sector practices must be changed so that they never
require or pressure individuals or organizations to use a nonfree
program. They should also discourage communication and publication
practices that imply such consequences (including
<a href="http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm">Digital
Restrictions Management</a>).</p></li>
-<li><p>Whenever a state entity distributes software to the public,
+<li><p><b>Distribute only free software</b><br />
+Whenever a state entity distributes software to the public,
including programs included in or specified by its web pages, it must
be distributed as free software, and must be capable of running on a
platform containing exclusively free software.</p></li>
-<li><p>State entity web sites and network services must be designed so
+<li><p><b>State web sites</b><br />
+State entity web sites and network services must be designed so
that users can use them, without disadvantage, by means of free
software exclusively.</p></li>
-<li><p>State entities must use only file formats and communication
+<li><p><b>Free formats and protocols</b><br />
+State entities must use only file formats and communication
protocols that are well supported by free software, preferably with
published specifications. (We do not state this in terms of
“standards” because it should apply to nonstandardized interfaces
as
@@ -81,7 +88,8 @@
codecs, and public libraries must not distribute works with Digital
Restrictions Management.</p></li>
-<li><p>Sale of computers must not require purchase of a proprietary
+<li><p><b>Untie computers from licenses</b><br />
+Sale of computers must not require purchase of a proprietary
software license. The seller should be required by law to offer the
purchaser the option of buying the computer without the proprietary
software and without paying the license fee.</p>
@@ -94,41 +102,48 @@
</li>
</ul>
+<h3>Computational Sovereignty</h3>
<p>Several policies affect the computational sovereignty of the state.
State entities must maintain control over their computing, not cede
control to private hands. These points apply to all computers,
including smartphones.</p>
<ul>
-<li><p>State entities must migrate to free software, and must not install,
+<li><p><b>Migrate to free software</b><br />
+State entities must migrate to free software, and must not install,
or continue using, any nonfree software except under a temporary
exception. Only one agency should have the authority to grant these
temporary exceptions, and only when shown compelling reasons. This
agency's goal should be to reduce the number of exceptions to zero.</p></li>
-<li><p>When a state entity pays for development of a computing solution,
+<li><p><b>Develop free IT solutions</b><br />
+When a state entity pays for development of a computing solution,
the contract must require it be delivered as free software and be
capable of running on a 100% free environment. All contracts must
require this, so that if the developer does not comply with this
requirement, the work cannot be paid for.</p></li>
-<li><p>When a state entity buys or leases computers, it must choose among
+<li><p><b>Choose computers for free software</b><br />
+When a state entity buys or leases computers, it must choose among
the models that come closest, in their class, to being capable of
running without any proprietary software. The state should maintain,
for each class of computers, a list of the models authorized based on
this criterion. Models available to both the public and the state
should be preferred to models available only to the state.</p></li>
-<li><p>The state should negotiate actively with manufacturers to bring
+<li><p><b>Negotiate with manufacturers</b><br />
+The state should negotiate actively with manufacturers to bring
about the availability in the market (to the state and the public) of
suitable hardware products, in all pertinent product areas, that
require no proprietary software.</p></li>
-<li><p>The state should invite other states to negotiate collectively with
+<li><p><b>Unite with other states</b><br />
+The state should invite other states to negotiate collectively with
manufacturers about suitable hardware products. Together they will
have more clout.</p></li>
</ul>
+<h3>Computational Sovereignty II</h3>
<p>The computational sovereignty (and security) of the state includes
control over the computers that do the state's work. This requires
avoiding <a href="/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html">
@@ -137,7 +152,8 @@
that diminish the state control over its computing. Therefore,</p>
<ul>
-<li>Every computer that the state uses must belong to or be leased by
+<li><b>State must control its computers</b><br />
+Every computer that the state uses must belong to or be leased by
the same branch of government that uses it, and that branch must not
cede to outsiders the right to decide who has physical access to the
computer, who can do maintenance (hardware or software) on it, or
@@ -146,25 +162,30 @@
the state is the occupant (either as owner or as tenant).</li>
</ul>
-<p>One other policy affects free and nonfree software development:</p>
+<h3>Influence Development</h3>
+<p>State policy affects free and nonfree software development:</p>
<ul>
-<li><p>The state should encourage developers to create or enhance free
+<li><p><b>Encourage free</b><br />
+The state should encourage developers to create or enhance free
software and who make it available to the public, e.g. by tax breaks
and other financial incentive. Contrariwise, no such incentives
should be granted for development, distribution or use of nonfree
software.</p></li>
-<li><p>In particular, proprietary software developers should not be able to
+<li><p><b>Don't encourage nonfree</b><br />
+In particular, proprietary software developers should not be able to
“donate” copies to schools and claim a tax write-off for the
nominal
value of the software. Proprietary software is not legitimate in a
school.</p></li>
</ul>
+<h3>E-waste</h3>
<p>Freedom should not imply e-waste:</p>
<ul>
-<li><p>Many modern computers are designed to make it impossible to
+<li><p><b>Replaceable software</b><br />
+Many modern computers are designed to make it impossible to
replace their preloaded software with free software. Thus, the only
way to free them is to junk them. This practice is harmful to
society.</p>
@@ -224,7 +245,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/03/31 18:05:09 $
+$Date: 2013/05/21 20:16:46 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy government-free-software.html,
Richard M. Stallman <=