www/philosophy stallman-kth.html

[Karl Berry]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Karl Berry <karl>       10/06/14 21:20:55

Modified files:
        philosophy     : stallman-kth.html 

Log message:
        try whole <dd> text as <p>, else no space before next para

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/stallman-kth.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15

Patches:
Index: stallman-kth.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/stallman-kth.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- stallman-kth.html   14 Jun 2010 13:17:26 -0000      1.14
+++ stallman-kth.html   14 Jun 2010 21:20:52 -0000      1.15
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@
 <dl>
 <dt><b>Q</b>: Has anyone tried to make problems for you?</dt>
 
-<dd><b>A:</b> The only time anyone has tried to make a problem for me
+<dd><p><b>A:</b> The only time anyone has tried to make a problem for me
 was those owners, so called, self-styled owners of Gosling Emacs.
 Aside from that they have no grounds to do so, so there is not much
 they can do.  By the way, I'd like to call everyone's attention to the
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@
 most flagrant example of this is the term &ldquo;pirate&rdquo;.
 Please refuse to use to use the term &ldquo;pirate&rdquo; to describe
 somebody who wishes to share software with his neighbor like a good
-citizen.
+citizen.</p>
 
 <p>I forgot to tell you this: The idea of copyright was invented after
 the printing press.  In ancient times authors copied from each other
@@ -1694,13 +1694,13 @@
 think there are any instances where, your opinion, it's right to own
 information?</dt>
 
-<dd><b>A:</b> With information that's not generally useful, or is of a
+<dd><p><b>A:</b> With information that's not generally useful, or is of a
 personal nature, I would say it's OK. In other words not information
 about how to do things, but information about what you intend to do.
 Information whose only value to others is speculative, that is they
 can take some money away from you, but they can't actually create
 anything with it.  It's perfectly reasonable I'd say to keep that sort
-of thing secret and controlled.
+of thing secret and controlled.</p>
 
 <p>But in terms of creative information, information that people can
 use or enjoy, and that will be used and enjoyed more the more people
@@ -1741,7 +1741,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2010/06/14 13:17:26 $
+$Date: 2010/06/14 21:20:52 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>