[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...
From: |
morphius |
Subject: |
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy... |
Date: |
Wed, 08 May 2002 12:03:08 -0700 (PDT) |
You wrote:
Chris is right. I think the GNU/FSF guys will be able to help us out in this.
Every database company has presence in this group and it is quite understandable
that they charge for this stuff, i suppose. They evidently have a dictionary
that has a different meaning for "Open" :-)
- Morphius
> On Wednesday 08 May 2002 16:56, you wrote:
> > Humm .. quite a stretch of the term "Open" at those
> > memberships fee prices. It there any kind of
> > encumberance on these specs that might screw us up?
>
> They're specs for 'open compatibility'.
> Implementing systems that conform to these won't cause any problems.
>
> At least I don't think so.
>
> Perhaps we could bounce this question over to the GNU guys who know.
>
> I hope not - the XA/XATMI stuff is really important as it'll allow Goldwater
> to integrate with products such as Oracle.
>
> C
> --
> Chris Smith
> Technical Architect - netFluid Technology Limited.
> "Internet Technologies, Distributed Systems and Tuxedo Consultancy"
> E: address@hidden W: http://www.nfluid.co.uk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vrs-development mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/vrs-development
>
>
- Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., (continued)
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., morphius, 2002/05/07
Fwd: Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Chris Smith, 2002/05/08
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy..., Chris Smith, 2002/05/08
Re: [Vrs-development] IBM Token Ring Thingy...,
morphius <=