Re: [uracoli-devel] error in UART baudrate?

[Axel Wachtler]

Am 22.12.2014 um 20:20 schrieb Tomás Glaria:
> If "serialdebug" is not mantained, then I guess I'll just implement
> another way, no problem.

Note that Wibo resides in the bootlaoder section, you have no IRQs 
available.

> I just need something check for modifications.

Blinking LEDs may be sufficient?

> Also, is there a 'long address comunication implementation'?

The RX adressfilter is feeded with short an long adresses.
Wibohost just sends the short adresses.

> I expect to have a 64bit address to use as an unvariable ID but to be
> able to change PAN_ID and SHORT_ADDRESS on the nodes by my application.
> Haven't found that yet.

Wibo is just using short adresses, the long address resides as flash 
end, we just reserved it for future use.


> Also, in the wibo.(txt/pdf) says the the bootloader application and
> wibohost application must be the same.
> That means that the bootloader can only program wireless nodes on it's
> same pan_id, am I right?

Yes. it is.

> Is this a restriction on the uracoli 'API' or only in the WiBo?
> Easily expandable to use any pan_id or not so trivial?

This restricition depends on Wibo and also on the hardware.

Is your number of nodes larger then 65533?

Best, Axel.