Re: 2003-02-12 / tramp-remote-path vs. LD_LIBRARY_PATH

[Kai Großjohann]

address@hidden writes:

> tramp makes use of a *PATH* to search executables.
>
> But what if one of these executables depends on a library to be
> found e.g through something like LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
>
> But there does not seem to be a possibility to make use of such a
> thing, right?

That's right.  You're the first to need it, I think.  Do you need it?

I was wondering to replace some of the things that are done by
tramp-open-connection-setup-interactive-shell and
tramp-post-connection by configurable action lists.  Then you could
inject your own shell code into it.

Some moons ago, I changed Tramp to have configurable actions for the
time before the first shell prompt comes.  But then I lost my energy
and didn't finishe the job to have actions for the time after the
first shell prompt...
-- 
A turnip curses Elvis