[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing
From: |
Thomas Preud'homme |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Jan 2013 17:30:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Le dimanche 6 janvier 2013 17:25:59, grischka a écrit :
> grischka wrote:
> > -
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git/commitdiff/3d409b08893873b917ccb8c34398bc
> > 41a4e84d7c
> >
> > The patch doesn't fix the real problem which is not duplicate -I's by
> > the user but the very obviously crappy handling of #include_next
> > itself. Of course the patch fixes something, but if we keep it chances
> > are that we'll never see a correct solution.
>
> Ok, I did that one.
> http://repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git/commitdiff/2358b378b3cd526956713f033f5a0ecaa
> 5f63951
>
> ;=)
Wow, that was super fast.
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/05
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Aharon Robbins, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Didier Barvaux, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Roy Tam, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Roy Tam, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, grischka, 2013/01/07
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Roy Tam, 2013/01/10
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/13
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Akim Demaille, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Thomas Preud'homme, 2013/01/14
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] Call for testing, Akim Demaille, 2013/01/14