Re: sed -i alternative

[Patrice Dumas]

On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:51:03AM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
>     I say "sed -i" can't be relied upon.
> 
> I agree that we shouldn't assume sed -i.
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion about using your sh function or perl
> as an alternative.  Patrice, can you do one or the other (or something)?
> I know I wouldn't be able to get to all the occurrences before I have to
> quit today.

I have mostly done that, by using sed with a temporary file, and in one
specific occurence, perl.  Will commit as soon as possible.

-- 
Pat