[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JDK1.3 vs. Kaffe
From: |
Marcus G. Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: JDK1.3 vs. Kaffe |
Date: |
11 Nov 2000 12:03:18 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.070084 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.84) Emacs/20.4 |
>>>>> "TTF" == Tee Toth-Fejel <address@hidden> writes:
TTF> C:\jheatbugs-2.1>javac *.java HeatbugModelSwarm.java:298: cannot
TTF> resolve symbol symbol : constructor FArgumentsImpl
TTF> (HeatbugModelSwarm,swarm.Selector,boolean) location: class
TTF> swarm.defobj.FArgumentsImpl new FArgumentsImpl (this, sel,
TTF> true))); ^ 1 error
In recent snapshots of Swarm, the usage of that constructor has
changed. Now the third argument should be "Globals.env.LanguageJava"
instead of "true". Perhaps your libkaffeswarm.dll and javaswarm.dll
aren't in sync?
TTF> Also, while I can compile TestMapIndex in JDK1.3, and run it in Kaffe,
TTF> it's OK: [..]
TTF> But it won't run in JDK1.3.
..don't know, it works from my Swarm build.
TTF> What would happen if the swarm.jar was compiled using JDK1.3?
TTF> How exactly *is* the swarm.jar produced?
swarm.jar is the same in both cases. You can find out how the swarm.jar
and javaswarm.dll/libkaffeswarm.dll are produced by doing a build
and watching what happens. Or look at the Makefiles and
source in the java/ subdirectory...
==================================
Swarm-Support is for discussion of the technical details of the day
to day usage of Swarm. For list administration needs (esp.
[un]subscribing), please send a message to <address@hidden>
with "help" in the body of the message.
- JDK1.3 vs. Kaffe, Tee Toth-Fejel, 2000/11/09
- RE: JDK1.3 vs. Kaffe, Tee Toth-Fejel, 2000/11/13
- floating point time scheduling, Andre Costa, 2000/11/13
- Re: floating point time scheduling, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/11/22
- Re: floating point time scheduling, Andre Costa, 2000/11/22
- Re: floating point time scheduling, Marcus G. Daniels, 2000/11/22
- Re: floating point time scheduling, Paul E Johnson, 2000/11/24