[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shared library
From: |
Ho-Sheng Hsiao |
Subject: |
Re: Shared library |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jan 1997 19:16:47 -0500 (EST) |
On Mon, 20 Jan 1997, glen e. p. ropella wrote:
> > Out of curiosity: is there an advantage (or disadvantage) in using
> > dynamically linked Swarm libs?
> Definite advantage. Dynamic loading allows optimization of the
> process that provides performance levels light-years beyond that
> of static loading. Unfortunately, we don't have a dynamically
> loadable version of Swarm, yet.
So in other words, it isn't enough to compile Swarm as shared library, but
portions of the code has to be rewritten? Which portions would they be?