[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [STUMP] Travis CI broken on Github

From: Evan
Subject: Re: [STUMP] Travis CI broken on Github
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:15:46 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0

When you say "sbcl always passes" do you mean even when broken code is 

Where is the code for the travis builds kept? Do we have a repo containing the 
that travis follows?

With regards to ditching travis if we can't figure out how to get the ccl/clisp 
builds to
work properly, it seems that we're still better off with one of the platforms 
tested, even if it means you have to investigate every failed travis build. 
It's not
ideal, and it'd probably be worth it to either cut out or move the ccl/clisp 
builds to
their own branch while we investigate what's wrong, but ditching travis all 
together is
probably unnecessary.


On 08/07/2015 03:34 AM, David Bjergaard wrote:
> sbcl always passes, while clisp and ccl fail:
> ccl:
> clisp:
> sbcl:
>     David
> Evan <address@hidden> writes:
>> Can you give an example of how the travis builds are broken?
>> -E
>> On 08/06/2015 03:16 AM, David Bjergaard wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Does anyone know how to fix the travis builds? Its making it really hard to 
>>> know
>>> if its safe to merge PRs or if I'm not breaking stuff.  If it can't be 
>>> fixed, I
>>> would prefer that we remove it and go back to the old way (waiting for bug
>>> reports :$)
>>>     Dave
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]