Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x

[Kamil Shakirov]

On 10/16/2012 12:58 AM, Shawn Betts wrote:
> Hi Kamil,
>
> What I meant was that the actual patches applied to the master branch
> didn't include the formatting changes. It's a bit of an anal
> bookkeeping request but that's how I am I guess :).

Ok :)

> I think all those patches in your branch wrapped into a single
> one--minus the unrelated formatting changes--would be okay.

Did the latest commit 13cd2eb fix that? :) As I can see now the only 
changes left (I checked the diff between master and lispworks branches) 
are only related to LispWorks port.

As for the explicit Quicklisp loading code (that may seem to be 
unrelated) in make-image.lisp.in and manual.lisp, LispWorks doesn't read 
a user's init script before calling eval from a command line or 
saving/delivering an image so we have to load Quicklisp/ASDF first.

Or am I missing something? :)

> -Shawn
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Kamil Shakirov <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> >
> > On 10/15/2012 11:42 PM, Shawn Betts wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Kamil Shakirov <address@hidden>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have ported the latest StumpWM to LispWorks 6.x (tested with LW Pro
> > > > and Personal editions). Is anyone interested in merging it?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Kamil,
> > >
> > > I had a look at the patches and they all seem good except for the
> > > initial port df2227d on github. There are formatting changes that are
> > > irrelevant to the port. If you can eliminate those, I'll pull it into
> > > master.
> >
> >
> > Sorry about that ;-) I just commited a patch 13cd2eb that removes irrelevant
> > formatting from make-image.lisp.in file.
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the StumpWM.
> >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > -Shawn
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
> >
> >
> > --
> > --ska.


--
--ska.