Re: [Sks-devel] Depeering Notice

[dirk astrath]

Hello,

>> My "limit" is "not-ok"-status on Kristians statistik-page and no update
>> within around 8 to 10 weeks (field "last updated").
> Why do you care if (latest) status OK or not?
> Kristian just marks if a server is pool member or not.
> A server may be excluded from the pool due to several reasons.
> E.g. its version number is lower than required.
> Don't you want to peer with v1.1.4 servers?
> Or don't you want to peer with servers having too few keys?
> How they will get the missing keys if no one is willing
> to peer them? :-)
> Don't you want to peer with private servers that off pool
> intentionally?

There are at least two peers of one of my systems, who are not on the
mail list, but I'm still peering:

CAcert

This one is excluded by Kristian upon request, therefore it's not even
on the "Recorded peers"-List.

hockeypuck.fidocon.de

This one (better: two) servers are running as a HA/failover-system, but
excluded from the list due to "wrong software" or "wrong version".

Some more systems are removed from the peers list by nginx from my site
(internal system names to keep my servers in sync).

... but if Kristians "Recorded Peers" tell me, that the last status
update was months ago AND i cannot reach this system from my server(s),
something must be wrong there.

Which means: Ask via mail/... about the server status and/or de-peer.

Most times there is no answer ... ;-(

However:

If there is a peering-request to me I normally grant it ... ;-)

(If it's a general one I may answer/peer ... or not ... depending on my
current workload ... ;-) )

Kind regards,

dirk

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature