[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers
From: |
Kiss Gabor (Bitman) |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:58:31 +0200 (CEST) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) |
> There are other definitions for "optimum" such as minimal propagation
> latency across all peers, or minimum distance to all other nodes.
> Almost certainly someone has modeled gossip protocols, lemme dig a bit.
>
> The minimum distance is likely computable simply from collecting
> a snapshot of existing peers and then computing maximum path length
> for each node to all other nodes, and comparing your node with others.
>
> Minimum latency would require a simulation perhaps, using a model with
> parameters derived from an existing log file to get the parametrs about right.
I don't worry about QoS and random errors at all.
However I would care with sabbotage.
An important characteristic of the topology is:
At least how many node should be blocked/destroyed/denied by
an attacker to split the network (graph) into two or more
unconnected parts?
Gabor
- [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Andy Ruddock, 2011/04/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Gabor Kiss, 2011/04/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Jeff Johnson, 2011/04/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Robert J. Hansen, 2011/04/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Ari Trachtenberg, 2011/04/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Andy Ruddock, 2011/04/23
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Jeff Johnson, 2011/04/23
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Andy Ruddock, 2011/04/23
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, David Benfell, 2011/04/24
Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, robert.O, 2011/04/21