[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches
From: |
David Shaw |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Oct 2004 13:18:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, David Shaw wrote:
>
> >
> > 208: if the key is thought to be revoked, put an 'r' in the
> > pub flags field.
>
> > The change in 209 does not match the MR spec, but if showing uat
> > records is generally thought to be useful, I can add it to the spec.
> > I'm not sure that anyone receiving a MR listing would care if a uat
> > exists, but I guess the program could note something like "this key
> > also has a photo ID" or the like.
>
> What it did before was print some binary stuff to the client:
>
> http://pgpkeys.telering.at/pks/lookup?search=0x21DB31C5&options=mr
> vs.
> http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?search=0x21DB31C5&options=mr
>
> It you think that not printing anything at all is the proper action,
> that should be no problem at all.
Certainly printing the binary stuff was bad. I don't have a strong
feeling on whether the best thing to do is to print nothing, or to
invent a 'uat' record and use it. Certainly if we need a uat record
in the future it is easy enough to add it then. Or we can add it now.
David
- Re: UTF-8/non-ASCII chars in keys (was Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches), (continued)
Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches, David Shaw, 2004/10/19
- Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches, Peter Palfrader, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches, Yaron Minsky, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches, Peter Palfrader, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches, Jason Harris, 2004/10/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches, Dinko Korunic, 2004/10/20
Re: [Sks-devel] 1.0.8 patches,
David Shaw <=