sks-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Sks-devel] Touble getting started with sks


From: Dan Egli
Subject: Re: [Sks-devel] Touble getting started with sks
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 22:34:59 -0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030723 Thunderbird/0.1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sacha J. Bernstein wrote:

|
| I'm just starting using SKS, and I'm having trouble getting a keydump
| loaded.  Below are the messages I'm getting.  Anyone have any ideas
| what's going wrong and how I can correct it?  I'm using the lastest SKS
| from CVS.
|
| Thanks,
|
| Sacha
|
|
| === Running fastbuild... ===
| 2003-11-28 21:04:45 Opening KeyDB database
| 2003-11-28 21:04:46 Loading 150000 keys at a time
| === Cleaning key database... ===
| 2003-11-28 21:04:46 Opening KeyDB database
| 2003-11-28 21:04:46 Keydb opened
| 2003-11-28 21:04:46 Database already deduped
| 2003-11-28 21:04:46 Merging keys in database
| 2003-11-28 21:04:46 Starting key merge
| Unknown command cleandb
| === Building ptree database... ===
| 2003-11-28 21:04:46 Opening PTree database
| 2003-11-28 21:04:47 Opening dbs...
| 2003-11-28 21:04:47 Opening KeyDB database
| Unknown command pbuild
| === Done! ===


Sounds to me like sks did not get built properly. I'm also using the CVS
sks and have not expereinced this. Since SKS 1.0.5 is still beta you
might want to consider using 1.0.4 then upgrading. Otherwise I'd say to
a make clean, then re-make the binary, re-install it, and try again. You
do have a keydump right? It's just because of these issues that you go
from starting fastbbuild to cleandb in one second?

- --- Dan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/yDADtwT22Jak4/4RArS1AJ4zKIQ2pt74LT25tglTmK/fanjhEACfaldE
9YkLARJ5r0+WPbyghhhtryY=
=rXXj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]