[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:01:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Petr Hluzín wrote:
> So, is it the C variant maintained? Maybe.
Not really. The main reason this variant still exists at all is that
avr-libc's regression testing uses it, and it uses some of the more
obscure features of it (like the ability to leave a "coredump" file
after the simulation has stopped that can then be analyzed
externally), which I don't think makes much sense to import them into
the C++ version. A broad variety of supported devices is not
important for this anyway, as it's mostly about verifying algorithms.
I wonder which bug reports there are ... Well, I might look into them
if someone really asks me about it.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Олег Большаков, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Petr Hluzín, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Олег Большаков, 2011/02/18
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Олег Большаков, 2011/02/18
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Joerg Wunsch, 2011/02/18
- [Simulavr-devel] Re: [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Олег Большаков, 2011/02/18
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Joerg Wunsch, 2011/02/18