[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?
From: |
Petr Hluzín |
Subject: |
Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not? |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Feb 2011 22:46:10 +0100 |
Hello
2011/2/17 Олег Большаков <address@hidden>:
> ...
> I can also see many TODOs for atmega8 device in the last simulavr
> release 0.1.2.6.
>
> The question:
> Is the development of simulavr is still maintained?
>
> We are intersted in using some AVR-simulator. Is it reasonably to
> maintain simulavr in your opinion?
There are two flavors of simulavr: the one written in C and the other
in C++ (formerly simulavr++) in Git repo.
Last commit into the C variant was 2009-03-05 and yes, the 0.1.2.6
version you are using is the newest, unfortunately. [1]
The C++ variant is is/was developed more recently, last significant
changes were several months ago.
I think the C++ variant currently has superset of features of the C
variant. It also supports ATmega8 (thanks to Ivica Safranko). Consider
migrating to the C++.
So, is it the C variant maintained? Maybe. There are some patches for
C waiting to be commited.
(I am not familiar with the C codebase, so I am leaving the
responsibility of committing them to others.)
[1]
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/simulavr/ChangeLog?revision=1.254&root=simulavr&view=markup
--
Petr Hluzin
- [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Олег Большаков, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?,
Petr Hluzín <=
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Joerg Wunsch, 2011/02/17
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Олег Большаков, 2011/02/18
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Олег Большаков, 2011/02/18
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Joerg Wunsch, 2011/02/18
- [Simulavr-devel] Re: [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Олег Большаков, 2011/02/18
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] Re: [SimulAVR development] Maintained or not?, Joerg Wunsch, 2011/02/18