|
From: | JoëlKrähemann |
Subject: | [Savannah-register-public] [task #14667] Submission of Advanced Gtk+ Sequencer Library |
Date: | Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:45:52 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:56.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/56.0 |
Follow-up Comment #11, task #14667 (project administration): Recently I have stated that libags_server.so is licensed under the terms of the GNU AGPLv3+. The person corrected me and told we license source files and not binaries. You are complaining about copyright of generated files. I think it is questionable if you can license them at all. Another problem is more that as you run `autoreconf -fi` new versions of the files are going to be installed. So copyright notice would be in first instance misleading. Uncertain copyright fits the situation best since it is up to upstream to make copyright decisions. Recently I read about RMS arguing with free software license you should obtain a patent, too. Is this yet solved? _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?14667> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |